@Article{作者信息:doi / 10.2196/31401 =“凯金褐色,雷纳和Koh,小凌和Le,丹尼尔和Banerjee Sumita亚蔡,马丁Tze-Wei和Chan罗伊咕哇,Wong克里斯蒂娜对剧中Tai,蜜蜂Choo和黄,梅伊丽安,厨师,亚历克斯·R和陈马克I-Cheng和黄、陈Seong”,标题= "效应的一个流行的Web戏剧视频系列艾滋病毒和其它性传播感染测试中同性恋,双性恋,在新加坡和其他男人发生性关系的男人:基于社区的,实用的,随机对照试验”,期刊=“J Med Internet Res”,年=“2022”,月=“5”,日=“6”,卷=“24”,数=“5”,页=“e31401”,关键词=“HIV;性病;测试;健康促进;电子健康;背景:同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)感染艾滋病毒和其他性传播感染(STI)的风险高得不成比例。虽然全球GBMSM的艾滋病毒/性传播感染检测率正在上升,但在各种情况下仍不理想。虽然许多研究试图评估各种基于社区的活动的有效性,包括基于同伴和提醒的艾滋病毒/性传播感染检测干预措施,但很少有人试图为一部网络电视剧这样做。目的:本研究评估了由新加坡社区组织为GBMSM开发的流行网络戏剧视频系列对艾滋病毒和其他性传播感染检测行为的有效性。 Methods: The study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial to evaluate a popular web drama video series developed by a community-based organization in Singapore for GBMSM. A total of 300 HIV-negative, GBMSM men in Singapore aged 18 to 29 years old were recruited and block-randomized into the intervention (n=150) and control arms (n=150). Primary outcomes included changes in self-reported intention to test for, actual testing for, and regularity of testing for HIV, syphilis, chlamydia or gonorrhea, while secondary outcomes include changes in a variety of other knowledge-based and psychosocial measures at the end of the study period. Results: Overall, 83.3{\%} (125/150) of participants in the intervention arm completed the proof of completion survey, compared to 88.7{\%} (133/150) in the control arm. We found improvements in self-reporting as a regular (at least yearly) tester for HIV (15.9{\%} difference, 95{\%} CI, 3.2{\%} to 28.6{\%}; P=.02), as well as chlamydia or gonorrhea (15.5{\%} difference, 95{\%} CI, 4.2{\%} to 26.9{\%}; P=.009), indicating that the intervention had positively impacted these outcomes compared to the control condition. We also found improvements in participants' intentions to test for HIV (16.6{\%} difference, 95{\%} CI, 4.3{\%} to 28.9{\%}; P=.009), syphilis (14.8{\%} difference, 95{\%} CI, 3.2{\%} to 26.4{\%}; P=.01), as well as chlamydia or gonorrhea (15.4{\%} difference, 95{\%} CI, 4.2{\%} to 26.6{\%}; P=.008), in the next 3 months, indicating that the intervention was effective in positively impacting intention for HIV and other STI testing among participants. Conclusions: There are clear benefits for promoting intentions to test regularly and prospectively on a broad scale through this intervention. This intervention also has potential to reach GBMSM who may not have access to conventional HIV and other STI prevention messaging, which have typically been implemented at sex-on-premises venues, bars, clubs, and in sexual health settings frequented by GBMSM. When coupled with community or population-wide structural interventions, the overall impact on testing will likely be significant. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04021953; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04021953 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033855 ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/31401", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2022/5/e31401", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/31401", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35522470" }
Baidu
map