@Article{info:doi/10.2196/39555，作者=“Alexander, Shelley and Seenan, Chris”，标题=“基于互联网的外周动脉疾病和间歇性跛行治疗与管理信息的可信度、准确性和全全性:综述”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2022”，月=“Oct”，日=“17”，卷=“24”，号=“10”，页=“e39555”，关键词=“外周动脉疾病;间歇性跛行;健康信息;教育;互联网;电子健康;背景:外周动脉疾病(PAD)影响着全世界数百万人，而自我管理是该疾病管理的一个核心组成部分。互联网是许多人获取健康信息的重要来源。然而，有关PAD治疗建议的网站内容尚未得到充分评估。目的:本研究旨在通过比较当前PAD和间歇性跛行(IC)治疗和管理指南的内容，评估通过普通搜索引擎找到的网站的可信度、准确性和全面性。 Methods: A review of websites from hospitals, universities, governments, consumer organizations, and professional associations in the United States and the United Kingdom was conducted. Website recommendations for the treatment of PAD and IC were coded in accordance with the guidelines of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American Heart Association (AHA). Primary outcomes were website credibility (4-item Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark), website accuracy (in terms of the percentage of accurate recommendations), and comprehensiveness of website recommendations (in terms of the percentage of guideline recommendations that were appropriately covered). Secondary outcomes were readability (Flesch--Kincaid grade level) and website quality (Health On the Net Foundation's code of conduct). Results: After screening, 62 websites were included in this analysis. Only 45{\%} (28/62) of websites met the credibility requirement by stating they were updated after the NICE guidelines were published. Declaration of authorship and funding and the presence of reference lists were less commonly reported. Regarding accuracy, 81{\%} (556/685) of website recommendations were deemed accurate on following NICE's and the AHA's recommendations. Comprehensiveness was low, with an average of 40{\%} (25/62) of guideline treatment recommendations being appropriately covered by websites. In most cases, readability scores revealed that the websites were too complex for web-based consumer health information. Conclusions: Web-based information from reputable sources about the treatment and management of PAD and IC are generally accurate but have low comprehensiveness, credibility, and readability. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/39555", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2022/10/e39555", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/39555", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36251363" }