@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/39243,作者=“Martinengo, Laura和Jabir, Ahmad Ishqi和Goh, Westin Wei Tin和Lo, Nicholas Yong Wai和Ho,月亮-Ho Ringo和Kowatsch, Tobias和Atun, Rifat和Michie, Susan和Tudor Car, Lorainne”,标题=“医疗保健中的会话代理:其行为改变技术和基础理论的范围审查”,期刊=“J医学互联网研究”,年=“2022”,月=“10月”,日=“3”,卷=“24”,数=“10”,页=“e39243”,关键词=“行为改变;行为改变技术;会话剂;聊天机器人;背景:会话代理(ca)在医疗保健中越来越多地用于提供行为改变干预。它们的评估通常包括使用BCT分类v1 (BCTTv1)是最常见的分类系统之一的分类系统对行为改变技术(BCT)进行分类。先前的研究对ca提供的行为改变干预措施进行了描述性总结,但迄今为止还没有发表关于bct在这些干预措施中的使用的深入研究。目的:本综述旨在描述ca提供的行为改变干预措施,并确定bct和指导其设计的理论。方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane的中央对照试验登记册,以及2021年4月谷歌和谷歌Scholar的前10页。我们纳入了评估CA提供的行为改变干预的初步实验研究。BCTs编码遵循BCTTv1。 Two independent reviewers selected the studies and extracted the data. Descriptive analysis and frequent itemset mining to identify BCT clusters were performed. Results: We included 47 studies reporting on mental health (n=19, 40{\%}), chronic disorders (n=14, 30{\%}), and lifestyle change (n=14, 30{\%}) interventions. There were 20/47 embodied CAs (43{\%}) and 27/47 CAs (57{\%}) represented a female character. Most CAs were rule based (34/47, 72{\%}). Experimental interventions included 63 BCTs, (mean 9 BCTs; range 2-21 BCTs), while comparisons included 32 BCTs (mean 2 BCTs; range 2-17 BCTs). Most interventions included BCTs 4.1 ``Instruction on how to perform a behavior'' (34/47, 72{\%}), 3.3 ``Social support'' (emotional; 27/47, 57{\%}), and 1.2 ``Problem solving'' (24/47, 51{\%}). A total of 12/47 studies (26{\%}) were informed by a behavior change theory, mainly the Transtheoretical Model and the Social Cognitive Theory. Studies using the same behavior change theory included different BCTs. Conclusions: There is a need for the more explicit use of behavior change theories and improved reporting of BCTs in CA interventions to enhance the analysis of intervention effectiveness and improve the reproducibility of research. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/39243", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2022/10/e39243", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/39243", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36190749" }
Baidu
map