@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/22107，作者=“Ebert, David Daniel和Franke, Marvin和Zarski, Anna-Carlotta和Berking, Matthias和Riper, Heleen和Cuijpers, Pim和Funk, Burkhardt和Lehr, Dirk”，标题=“基于互联网的移动支持的压力管理干预作为一种普遍预防方法的有效性和主持人:随机对照试验”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2021”，月=“12月”，日=“22”，量=“23”，数=“12”，页数=“e22107”，关键词=“压力管理干预;普遍预防;职业卫生;背景:新出现的证据表明，基于互联网的移动支持的压力管理干预措施(iSMIs)对高度压力的员工是有效的。然而，目前尚不清楚在普遍预防方法中，如果没有预选过程，ismi是否也有效，这更类似于常规职业保健。此外，关于ismi对谁合适，对谁不合适的证据也很少。目的:本研究的目的是评价iSMI GET。在没有基线纳入标准的普遍预防方法中的压力，并检查干预效果的调节因子。方法:共396名员工被随机分配到干预组和6个月等待名单对照组。 The iSMI consisted of 7 sessions and 1 booster session and offered no therapeutic guidance. Self-report data were assessed at baseline, 7 weeks, and at 6 months following randomization. The primary outcome was perceived stress. Several a priori defined moderators were explored as potential effect modifiers. Results: Participants in the intervention group reported significantly lower perceived stress at posttreatment (d=0.71, 95{\%} CI 0.51-0.91) and at 6-month follow-up (d=0.61, 95{\%} CI 0.41-0.81) compared to those in the waiting list control group. Significant differences with medium-to-large effect sizes were found for all mental health and most work-related outcomes. Resilience (at 7 weeks, P=.04; at 6 months, P=.01), agreeableness (at 7 weeks, P=.01), psychological strain (at 6 months, P=.04), and self-regulation (at 6 months, P=.04) moderated the intervention effects. Conclusions: This study indicates that iSMIs can be effective in a broad range of employees with no need for preselection to achieve substantial effects. The subgroups that might not profit had extreme values on the respective measures and represented only a very small proportion of the investigated sample, thereby indicating the broad applicability of GET.ON Stress. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005699; https://www.drks.de/DRKS00005699 ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/22107", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2021/12/e22107", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/22107", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34941541" }