@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/18816，作者="van der Keylen, Piet and Tomandl, Johanna and Wollmann, Katharina and M{\"o}hler, Ralph and Sofroniou, Mario and Maun, Andy and Voigt-Radloff, Sebastian and Frank, Luca"，标题="家庭医生在线健康信息需求:定性与定量研究的系统综述"，期刊="J Med Internet Res"，年="2020"，月="12"，日="30"，卷="22"，数="12"，页数="e18816"，关键词="家庭医生;全科医生;初级保健;需求;障碍;在线信息;健康信息;卫生资源;互联网;信息寻求行为; mobile phone", abstract="Background: Digitalization and the increasing availability of online information have changed the way in which information is searched for and retrieved by the public and by health professionals. The technical developments in the last two decades have transformed the methods of information retrieval. Although systematic evidence exists on the general information needs of specialists, and in particular, family physicians (FPs), there have been no recent systematic reviews to specifically address the needs of FPs and any barriers that may exist to accessing online health information. Objective: This review aims to provide an up-to-date perspective on the needs of FPs in searching, retrieving, and using online information. Methods: This systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies searched a multitude of databases spanning the years 2000 to 2020 (search date January 2020). Studies that analyzed the online information needs of FPs, any barriers to the accessibility of information, and their information-seeking behaviors were included. Two researchers independently scrutinized titles and abstracts, analyzing full-text papers for their eligibility, the studies therein, and the data obtained from them. Results: The initial search yielded 4541 studies for initial title and abstract screening. Of the 144 studies that were found to be eligible for full-text screening, 41 were finally included. A total of 20 themes were developed and summarized into 5 main categories: individual needs of FPs before the search; access needs, including factors that would facilitate or hinder information retrieval; quality needs of the information to hand; utilization needs of the information available; and implication needs for everyday practice. Conclusions: This review suggests that searching, accessing, and using online information, as well as any pre-existing needs, barriers, or demands, should not be perceived as separate entities but rather be regarded as a sequential process. Apart from accessing information and evaluating its quality, FPs expressed concerns regarding the applicability of this information to their everyday practice and its subsequent relevance to patient care. Future online information resources should cater to the needs of the primary care setting and seek to address the way in which such resources may be adapted to these specific requirements. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/18816", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2020/12/e18816/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/18816", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33377874" }