@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/12802，作者=“Blease, Charlotte and Kaptchuk, Ted J and Bernstein, Michael H and Mandl, Kenneth D and Halamka, John D and DesRoches, Catherine M”，标题=“人工智能与初级保健的未来:英国全科医生观点的探索性定性研究”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2019”，月=“Mar”，日=“20”，卷=“21”，数=“3”，页=“e12802”，关键词=“人工智能”;的态度;未来;一般实践;机器学习;意见;初级保健;定性研究;背景:机器学习颠覆医疗行业的潜力是生物医学信息学和相关领域内持续争论的主题。目的:本研究旨在探讨全科医生对未来技术对初级保健关键任务的潜在影响的看法。 Methods: In June 2018, we conducted a Web-based survey of 720 UK GPs' opinions about the likelihood of future technology to fully replace GPs in performing 6 key primary care tasks, and, if respondents considered replacement for a particular task likely, to estimate how soon the technological capacity might emerge. This study involved qualitative descriptive analysis of written responses (``comments'') to an open-ended question in the survey. Results: Comments were classified into 3 major categories in relation to primary care: (1) limitations of future technology, (2) potential benefits of future technology, and (3) social and ethical concerns. Perceived limitations included the beliefs that communication and empathy are exclusively human competencies; many GPs also considered clinical reasoning and the ability to provide value-based care as necessitating physicians' judgments. Perceived benefits of technology included expectations about improved efficiencies, in particular with respect to the reduction of administrative burdens on physicians. Social and ethical concerns encompassed multiple, divergent themes including the need to train more doctors to overcome workforce shortfalls and misgivings about the acceptability of future technology to patients. However, some GPs believed that the failure to adopt technological innovations could incur harms to both patients and physicians. Conclusions: This study presents timely information on physicians' views about the scope of artificial intelligence (AI) in primary care. Overwhelmingly, GPs considered the potential of AI to be limited. These views differ from the predictions of biomedical informaticians. More extensive, stand-alone qualitative work would provide a more in-depth understanding of GPs' views. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/12802", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2019/3/e12802/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/12802", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892270" }