@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / / jmir。4862，作者=“Assmann, Karen E和Bailet, Marion和Lecoffre, Amandine C和Galan, Pilar和Hercberg, Serge和Amieva, H{\' E}ne和Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle”，标题=“基于web的认知测试电池的自我管理和监督版本的比较:来自NutriNet-Sant{\' E}队列研究的结果”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2016”，月=“Apr”，日=“05”，卷=“18”，数=“4”，页=“e68”，关键词=“认知;执行功能;互联网;背景:痴呆症是一个主要的公共卫生问题，来自大规模流行病学研究的重复认知数据可以帮助制定有效的早期预防措施。通过自我管理的在线工具收集数据可以大大减轻这种大规模调查的后勤和财政负担。在这种情况下，重要的是获得关于这种新的在线工具与传统的、有监督的认知评估模式的可比性的数据。目的:我们的目的是比较基于网络的NutriNet-Sant认知测试组(NutriCog)的自我管理与神经心理学家的管理。方法:测试包括四项测试，测量精神运动速度、注意力、执行功能、情景记忆、工作记忆和联想记忆等方面。两种版本的认知电池测试由189名志愿者完成(首先是自我管理版本，n=99，或先是监督版本，n=90)。 Subjects also completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Concordance was assessed by Spearman correlation. Results: Agreement between both versions varied according to the investigated cognitive task and outcome variable. Spearman correlations ranged between .42 and .73. Moreover, a majority of participants responded that they ``absolutely'' or ``rather'' agreed that the duration of the self-administered battery was acceptable (184/185, 99.5{\%}), that the tasks were amusing (162/185, 87.6{\%}), that the instructions were sufficiently detailed (168/185; 90.8{\%}) and understandable (164/185, 88.7{\%}), and that they had overall enjoyed the test battery (182/185, 98.4{\%}). Conclusions: The self-administered version of the Web-based NutriCog cognitive test battery provided similar information as the supervised version. Thus, integrating repeated cognitive evaluations into large cohorts via the implementation of self-administered online versions of traditional test batteries appears to be feasible. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/jmir.4862", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2016/4/e68/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4862", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27049114" }