@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / / jmir。4722，作者="Wang, Man Ping and Chu, Joanna TW and Viswanath, Kasisomayajula and Wan, Alice and Lam, Tai Hing and Chan, Sophia S"，标题=" Family Project在香港家庭沟通中的应用:家庭项目"，期刊="J Med Internet Res"，年="2015"，月="Aug"，日="24"，卷="17"，号="8"，页="e207"，关键词="信息与通信技术;家庭幸福;家庭沟通;背景:家庭沟通是家庭及其功能的核心。这是一个家庭成员创造、分享和调节意义的相互过程。信息通信技术的进步和扩散继续改变着家庭通信的方式。然而，人们对不同家庭沟通方式的使用及其对家庭幸福感的影响知之甚少。目的:研究与不同家庭沟通方式相关的社会人口学因素，以及这些因素与香港中国成年人家庭和谐、幸福和健康(3Hs)的关系。方法:数据来自全港概率电话调查，采用家庭及健康资讯趋势调查(FHInTs)。 Frequency of family communication using different methods (ie, face-to-face, phone, instant messaging [IM], social media sites, and email) were recoded and classified as frequent (always/sometimes) and nonfrequent (seldom/never) use. Family well-being was measured using 3 questions of perceived family harmony, happiness, and health with higher scores indicating better family well-being. Adjusted odds ratios for family communication methods by sociodemographic characteristics and adjusted beta coefficients for family well-being by communication methods were calculated. Results: A total of 1502 adults were surveyed. Face-to-face (94.85{\%}, 1408/1484) was the most frequent means of communication followed by phone (78.08{\%}, 796/1484), IM (53.64{\%}, 796/1484), social media sites (17.60{\%}, 261/1484), and email (13.39{\%}, 198/1484). Younger age was associated with the use of phone, IM, and social media sites for family communication. Higher educational attainment was associated with more frequent use of all modes of communication, whereas higher family income was only significantly associated with more frequent use of IM and email (P=.001). Face-to-face (beta 0.65, 95{\%} CI 0.33-0.97) and phone use (beta 0.20, 95{\%} CI 0.02-0.38) for family communication were associated with significantly higher levels of perceived family well-being. Conclusions: Socioeconomic disparities in using these information and communication technologies (ICT) methods for family communication were observed. Although traditional methods remain as the main platform for family communication and were associated with better family well-being, a notable proportion of respondents are using new ICT methods, which were not associated with perceived family well-being. Because ICTs will continue to diversify modes of family communication, more research is needed to understand the impact of ICTs on family communication and well-being. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/jmir.4722", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2015/8/e207/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4722", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26303434" }