@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / / jmir。2951，作者=“Kalz, Marco和Lenssen, Niklas和Felzen, Marc和Rossaint, Rolf和Tabuenca, Bernardo和Specht, Marcus和Skorning, Max”，标题=“心肺复苏训练和真实事件支持的智能手机应用程序:混合方法评估研究”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2014”，月=“3”，日=“19”，卷=“16”，数=“3”，页=“e89”，关键词=“基本生命支持(BLS);心肺复苏(CPR);胸外按压(ECC);智能手机应用程序;移动电话;背景:迄今为止，还没有针对复苏训练和真实事件支持的智能手机/移动应用程序的系统评估。为了为应用程序的开发提供医疗、可用性和其他质量标准，我们结合医疗专家和最终用户的观点进行了混合方法的顺序评估。目的:本研究旨在从专家和最终用户的角度评估当前用于心肺复苏(CPR)培训和真实事件支持的移动应用程序的质量。方法:两位独立的医学专家对谷歌Play商店和苹果应用商店的CPR应用程序的医疗内容进行了评估。 The evaluation was based on pre-defined minimum medical content requirements according to current Basic Life Support (BLS) guidelines. In a second phase, non-medical end-users tested usability and appeal of the apps that had at least met the minimum requirements. Usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS); appeal was measured with the self-developed ReactionDeck toolkit. Results: Out of 61 apps, 46 were included in the experts' evaluation. A consolidated list of 13 apps resulted for the following layperson evaluation. The interrater reliability was substantial (kappa=.61). Layperson end-users (n=14) had a high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation 1 [ICC1]=.83, P<.001, 95{\%} CI 0.75-0.882 and ICC2=.79, P<.001, 95{\%} CI 0.695-0.869). Their evaluation resulted in a list of 5 recommendable apps. Conclusions: Although several apps for resuscitation training and real incident support are available, very few are designed according to current BLS guidelines and offer an acceptable level of usability and hedonic quality for laypersons. The results of this study are intended to optimize the development of CPR mobile apps. The app ranking supports the informed selection of mobile apps for training situations and CPR campaigns as well as for real incident support. ", issn="14388871", doi="10.2196/jmir.2951", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2014/3/e89/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2951", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24647361" }