@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / / jmir。1095，作者=“Houston, Thomas K和Richman, Joshua S和Ray, Midge N和Allison, Jeroan J和Gilbert, Gregg H和Shewchuk, Richard M和Kohler, Connie L和Kiefe, Catarina I”，标题=“Internet为牙科实践中的烟草控制提供支持:随机对照试验”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2008”，月=“11”，日=“4”，卷=“10”，数=“5”，页=“e38”，关键词=“戒烟;互联网;全科，牙科;随机对照试验;卫生服务研究”，摘要=“背景:牙科就诊是控烟的独特机会。尽管有证据表明在牙科环境中有效，但提供者提供的简短戒烟建议未得到充分利用。目的:评估互联网提供的干预措施，旨在提高牙科诊所戒烟提供者简短建议的实施。方法:将190名牙科诊所随机分为干预网站组和等候名单组。干预前和随访8个月后，每家诊所向100名患者分发了出院卡(评估提供者绩效的简短患者调查，在牙科就诊后立即完成)。 Based on these exit cards, we assessed: whether patients were asked about tobacco use (ASK) and, among tobacco users, whether they were advised to quit tobacco (ADVISE). All intervention practices with follow-up exit card data were analyzed as randomized regardless of whether they participated in the Internet-delivered intervention. Results: Of the 190 practices randomized, 143 (75{\%}) dental practices provided follow-up data. Intervention practices' mean performance improved post-intervention by 4{\%} on ASK (29{\%} baseline, adjusted odds ratio = 1.29 [95{\%} CI 1.17-1.42]), and by 11{\%} on ADVISE (44{\%} baseline, OR = 1.55 [95{\%} CI 1.28-1.87]). Control practices improved by 3{\%} on ASK (Adj. OR 1.18 [95{\%} CI 1.07-1.29]) and did not significantly improve in ADVISE. A significant group-by-time interaction effect indicated that intervention practices improved more over the study period than control practices for ADVISE (P = 0.042) but not for ASK. Conclusion: This low-intensity, easily disseminated intervention was successful in improving provider performance on advice to quit. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00627185; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00627185 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5c5Kugvzj) ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/jmir.1095", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2008/5/e38/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1095", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18984559" }