TY - JOUR AU - Kulkarni, Pranav AU - Duffy, Orla AU - Synnott, Jonathan AU - Kernohan, W George AU - McNaney, Roisin PY - 2022 DA - 2022/1/5 TI -语音和语言从业者的商用语音辅助技术经验:基于网络的调查研究JO - JMIR Rehabil Assist technology SP - e29249 VL - 9 IS - 1kw -语音和语言治疗KW -语音辅助技术KW -专业实践KW -康复KW -语音治疗KW -健康技术KW -移动电话AB -背景:语音和语言治疗涉及识别、评估和治疗有沟通、饮食和吞咽困难的儿童和成人。在全球范围内，紧迫的需求超过了合格的从业人员的可用性，这些从业人员必须关注有高级需求的个人。语音辅助技术(VAT)在帮助语言障碍患者方面的潜力是一个新兴的研究领域，但探索其专业应用的实证工作有限。目的:本研究旨在探讨言语和语言治疗师(salt)与客户一起使用增值税的专业经验，以确定增值税的潜在应用和采用的障碍，从而为未来的研究方向提供参考。方法:利用一个基于网络的平台，从英国向高级盐部门分发了一份包含23个问题的调查，其中包括对增值税的看法和任何使用经验的问题的复选框和自由文本回答。使用免费文本的内容分析对数据进行描述性分析，为他们在实践中使用增值税的具体体验提供背景，包括未来使用增值税的障碍和机会。结果:共有230名英国专业人士完全完成了调查;大多数人在技术上有能力，并知道商业VATs(如Alexa和谷歌Assistant)。然而，只有49个(21.3%)salt与他们的客户使用了增值税，并描述了57个用例。 They reported using VAT with 10 different client groups, such as people with dysarthria and users of augmentative and alternative communication technologies. Of these, almost half (28/57, 49%) used the technology to assist their clients with day-to-day tasks, such as web browsing, setting up reminders, sending messages, and playing music. Many respondents (21/57, 37%) also reported using the technology to improve client speech, to facilitate speech practice at home, and to enhance articulation and volume. Most reported a positive impact of VAT use, stating improved independence (22/57, 39%), accessibility (6/57, 10%), and confidence (5/57, 8%). Some respondents reported increased client communication (5/57, 9%) and sociability (3/57, 5%). Reasons given for not using VAT in practice included lack of opportunity (131/181, 72.4%) and training (63/181, 34.8%). Most respondents (154/181, 85.1%) indicated that they would like to try VAT in the future, stating that it could have a positive impact on their clients’ speech, independence, and confidence. Conclusions: VAT is used by some UK-based SaLTs to enable communication tasks at home with their clients. However, its wider adoption may be limited by a lack of professional opportunity. Looking forward, additional benefits are promised, as the data show a level of engagement, empowerment, and the possibility of achieving therapeutic outcomes in communication impairment. The disparate responses suggest that this area is ripe for the development of evidence-based clinical practice, starting with a clear definition, outcome measurement, and professional standardization. SN - 2369-2529 UR - https://rehab.www.mybigtv.com/2022/1/e29249 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/29249 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34989694 DO - 10.2196/29249 ID - info:doi/10.2196/29249 ER -