期刊文章%@ 2369-2529 %I JMIR Publicatio卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析ns %V 9 %N 2 %P e 355669 %T芬兰远程物理治疗的现状:基于网络的横切调查问卷研究%A Hellstén,Thomas %A Arokoski,Jari %A Sjögren,Tuulikki %A Jäppinen,Anna-Maija %A Kettunen,Jyrki %+医学院，赫尔辛基大学P O Box 63, Haartmaninkatu 8，芬兰赫尔辛基，00014,358 407733154，thomas.hellsten@helsinki.fi %K COVID-19 %K远程物理治疗%K COVID-19大流行%K当前状态%K疾病组的适应性%K物理治疗师的能力%D 2022 %7 7.6.2022 %9原始论文%J JMIR康复援助技术%G英语%X背景:持续的COVID-19大流行要求社会、卫生和康复组织将远程物理治疗(RP)作为物理治疗师日常实践的一部分。康复疗法通过信息和通信技术为康复者提供物理治疗服务，可以改善人们获得物理治疗的机会。即使在这个世纪RP已经被引入，物理治疗师的意见、使用量和日常实践中的形式还没有被广泛研究。目的:本研究旨在调查芬兰物理治疗师对RP现状的看法。方法:在2021年3月向芬兰物理治疗师协会的工作年龄成员(n=5905)和2021年5月向一家私营物理治疗机构的物理治疗师(n=620)发送了一份定量、横断面、基于网络的问卷。问卷包括关于物理治疗师在不同疾病中RP的适用性以及RP在工作中的现状和实施情况的问题。结果:6525名物理治疗师中，共9.9% (n=662;n = 504, 76.1%女性; mean age 46.1, SD 12 years) answered the questionnaire. The mean suitability “score” (0=not suitable at all to 10=fully suitable) of RP in different disease groups varied from 3.3 (neurological diseases) to 6.1 (lung diseases). Between early 2020 (ie, just before the COVID-19 pandemic) and spring 2021, the proportion of physiotherapists who used RP increased from 33.8% (21/62) to 75.4% (46/61; P<.001) in the public sector and from 19.7% (42/213) to 76.6% (163/213; P<.001) in the private sector. However, only 11.7% (32/274) of physiotherapists reported that they spent >20% of their practice time for RP in 2021. The real-time method was the most common RP method in both groups (public sector 46/66, 69.7% vs private sector 157/219, 71.7%; P=.47). The three most commonly used technical equipments were computers/tablets (229/290, 79%), smartphones (149/290, 51.4%), and phones (voice call 51/290, 17.6%). The proportion of physiotherapists who used computers/tablets in RP was higher in the private sector than in the public sector (183/221, 82.8% vs 46/68, 67.6%; P=.01). In contrast, a higher proportion of physiotherapists in the public sector than in the private sector used phones (18/68, 26.5% vs 33/221, 14.9%; P=.04). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, physiotherapists increased their use of RP in their everyday practice, although practice time in RP was still low. When planning RP for rehabilitees, it should be considered that the suitability of RP in different diseases seems to vary in the opinion of physiotherapists. Furthermore, our results brought up important new information for developing social, health, and rehabilitation education for information and communications technologies. %M 3560 %R 10.2196/35569 %U https://rehab.www.mybigtv.com/2022/2/e35569 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/35569 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3560