%0期刊文章%@ 2369-2960 %I JMIR出版物%V 8% 卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析N 7% P e32969 %T论文请-国家和国际对免疫和疫苗接种护照态度的预测因素:在线代表调查%A Garrett,Paul M %A White,Joshua P %A Dennis,Simon %A Lewandowsky,Stephan %A Yang, chengta %A Okan,Yasmina %A Perfors,Andrew %A Little,Daniel R %A Kozyreva,Anastasia %A Lorenz-Spreen,Philipp %A Kusumi,Takashi %A Kashima,Yoshihisa %+墨尔本大学心理科学学院，墨尔本帕克维尔校区雷德蒙·巴里大厦12楼，墨尔本，3010，澳大利亚，61 8344 6377 ext 03，paul.garrett@unimelb.edu.au %K COVID-19 %K免疫护照%K疫苗接种护照%K跨文化%K卫生政策%K数字证书%K SARS-CoV-2 %K疫苗%K政策%K国际%D 2022 %7 15.7.2022 %9原始文件%J JMIR公共卫生监测%G英文%X背景:为了应对COVID-19大流行，各国正在推出数字护照，允许此前感染过(免疫护照)或接种过SARS-CoV-2疫苗(疫苗护照)的公民恢复正常活动。为了有效，政策决策者必须知道这些护照是否会被公众广泛接受，以及在什么条件下被公众广泛接受。这项研究的重点是免疫护照，因为这些护照在现有的COVID-19疫苗接种计划和没有疫苗接种计划的国家都可能有用;然而，我们的一般发现也延伸到接种护照。目的:我们旨在评估六个国家对引进豁免护照的态度，并确定哪些社会、个人和背景因素预测了他们的支持。方法:在2020年2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的4月至5月，我们通过在线代表性抽样在澳大利亚、日本、台湾、德国、西班牙和英国六个国家收集了13678名参与者，并评估了对引入豁免护照的态度和支持。结果:豁免护照的支持程度从中到低，最高的是德国(775/1507名参与者，51.43%)和英国(759/1484名，51.15%); followed by Taiwan (2841/5989, 47.44%), Australia (963/2086, 46.16%), and Spain (693/1491, 46.48%); and was the lowest in Japan (241/1081, 22.94%). Bayesian generalized linear mixed effects modeling was used to assess predictive factors for immunity passport support across countries. International results showed neoliberal worldviews (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.13-1.22), personal concern (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.16), perceived virus severity (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.14), the fairness of immunity passports (OR 2.51, 95% CI 2.36-2.66), liking immunity passports (OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.61-2.94), and a willingness to become infected to gain an immunity passport (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.51-1.68) were all predictive factors of immunity passport support. By contrast, gender (woman; OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.82-0.98), immunity passport concern (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.57-0.65), and risk of harm to society (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.76) predicted a decrease in support for immunity passports. Minor differences in predictive factors were found between countries and results were modeled separately to provide national accounts of these data. Conclusions: Our research suggests that support for immunity passports is predicted by the personal benefits and societal risks they confer. These findings generalized across six countries and may also prove informative for the introduction of vaccination passports, helping policymakers to introduce effective COVID-19 passport policies in these six countries and around the world. %M 35377317 %R 10.2196/32969 %U https://publichealth.www.mybigtv.com/2022/7/e32969 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/32969 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35377317