@Article{信息:doi/10.2196/32969，作者=“Garrett, Paul M和White, Joshua P和Dennis, Simon和Lewandowsky, Stephan和Yang, chengta和Okan, Yasmina和Perfors, Andrew和Little, Daniel R和Kozyreva, Anastasia和Lorenz-Spreen, Philipp和Kusumi, Takashi和Kashima, Yoshihisa”，标题=“论文请-国家和国际对免疫和疫苗接种护照态度的预测因素:“在线代表调查”，期刊=“JMIR公共卫生监测”，年=“2022”，月=“7”，日=“15”，卷=“8”，数=“7”，页=“e32969”，关键词=“COVID-19;免疫的护照;疫苗接种的护照;跨文化;卫生政策;数字证书;SARS-CoV-2;疫苗;政策; international", abstract="Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, countries are introducing digital passports that allow citizens to return to normal activities if they were previously infected with (immunity passport) or vaccinated against (vaccination passport) SARS-CoV-2. To be effective, policy decision-makers must know whether these passports will be widely accepted by the public and under what conditions. This study focuses attention on immunity passports, as these may prove useful in countries both with and without an existing COVID-19 vaccination program; however, our general findings also extend to vaccination passports. Objective: We aimed to assess attitudes toward the introduction of immunity passports in six countries, and determine what social, personal, and contextual factors predicted their support. Methods: We collected 13,678 participants through online representative sampling across six countries---Australia, Japan, Taiwan, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom---during April to May of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, and assessed attitudes and support for the introduction of immunity passports. Results: Immunity passport support was moderate to low, being the highest in Germany (775/1507 participants, 51.43{\%}) and the United Kingdom (759/1484, 51.15{\%}); followed by Taiwan (2841/5989, 47.44{\%}), Australia (963/2086, 46.16{\%}), and Spain (693/1491, 46.48{\%}); and was the lowest in Japan (241/1081, 22.94{\%}). Bayesian generalized linear mixed effects modeling was used to assess predictive factors for immunity passport support across countries. International results showed neoliberal worldviews (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, 95{\%} CI 1.13-1.22), personal concern (OR 1.07, 95{\%} CI 1.00-1.16), perceived virus severity (OR 1.07, 95{\%} CI 1.01-1.14), the fairness of immunity passports (OR 2.51, 95{\%} CI 2.36-2.66), liking immunity passports (OR 2.77, 95{\%} CI 2.61-2.94), and a willingness to become infected to gain an immunity passport (OR 1.6, 95{\%} CI 1.51-1.68) were all predictive factors of immunity passport support. By contrast, gender (woman; OR 0.9, 95{\%} CI 0.82-0.98), immunity passport concern (OR 0.61, 95{\%} CI 0.57-0.65), and risk of harm to society (OR 0.71, 95{\%} CI 0.67-0.76) predicted a decrease in support for immunity passports. Minor differences in predictive factors were found between countries and results were modeled separately to provide national accounts of these data. Conclusions: Our research suggests that support for immunity passports is predicted by the personal benefits and societal risks they confer. These findings generalized across six countries and may also prove informative for the introduction of vaccination passports, helping policymakers to introduce effective COVID-19 passport policies in these six countries and around the world. ", issn="2369-2960", doi="10.2196/32969", url="https://publichealth.www.mybigtv.com/2022/7/e32969", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/32969", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35377317" }