@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/37203，作者=“Kasting, Monica L和Macy, Jonathan T和Grannis, Shaun J和Wiensch, Ashley J和Lavista Ferres, Juan M和Dixon, Brian E”，标题=“与接受COVID-19疫苗意向相关的因素:横断面国家研究”，期刊=“JMIR公共卫生监测”，年=“2022”，月=“11”，日=“14”，卷=“8”，数=“11”，页=“e37203”，关键词=“SARS-CoV-2;COVID-19疫苗;疫苗接种的意图;疫苗犹豫;健康信念模型;理性行动法;COVID-19;疫苗接种;公共卫生;在线调查; health intervention; logistic regression; demographic", abstract="Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented public health crisis, and vaccines are the most effective means of preventing severe consequences of this disease. Hesitancy regarding vaccines persists among adults in the United States, despite overwhelming scientific evidence of safety and efficacy. Objective: The purpose of this study was to use the Health Belief Model (HBM) and reasoned action approach (RAA) to examine COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy by comparing those who had already received 1 vaccine to those who had received none. Methods: This study examined demographic and theory-based factors associated with vaccine uptake and intention among 1643 adults in the United States who completed an online survey during February and March 2021. Survey items included demographic variables (eg, age, sex, political ideology), attitudes, and health belief variables (eg, perceived self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility). Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used for vaccine uptake/intent. The first model included demographic variables. The second model added theory-based factors to examine the association of health beliefs and vaccine uptake above and beyond the associations explained by demographic characteristics alone. Results: The majority of participants were male (n=974, 59.3{\%}), White (n=1347, 82.0{\%}), and non-Hispanic (n=1518, 92.4{\%}) and reported they had already received a COVID-19 vaccine or definitely would when it was available to them (n=1306, 79.5{\%}). Demographic variables significantly associated with vaccine uptake/intent included age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.05, 95{\%} CI 1.04-1.06), other race (AOR 0.47, 95{\%} CI 0.27-0.83 vs White), and political ideology (AOR 15.77, 95{\%} CI 7.03-35.35 very liberal vs very conservative). The theory-based factors most strongly associated with uptake/intention were attitudes (AOR 3.72, 95{\%} CI 2.42-5.73), self-efficacy (AOR 1.75, 95{\%} CI 1.34-2.29), and concerns about side effects (AOR 0.59, 95{\%} CI 0.46-0.76). Although race and political ideology were significant in the model of demographic characteristics, they were not significant when controlling for attitudes and beliefs. Conclusions: Vaccination represents one of the best tools to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other possible pandemics in the future. This study showed that older age, attitudes, injunctive norms, descriptive norms, and self-efficacy are positively associated with vaccine uptake and intent, whereas perceived side effects and lack of trust in the vaccine are associated with lower uptake and intent. Race and political ideology were not significant predictors when attitudes and beliefs were considered. Before vaccine hesitancy can be addressed, researchers and clinicians must understand the basis of vaccine hesitancy and which populations may show higher hesitancy to the vaccination so that interventions can be adequately targeted. ", issn="2369-2960", doi="10.2196/37203", url="https://publichealth.www.mybigtv.com/2022/11/e37203", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/37203", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36219842" }