@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/27183，作者=“刘，杰西卡和赖特，卡罗琳和威廉姆斯，菲利帕和Elizarova，奥尔加和Dahne，詹妮弗和边，江和赵，云鹏和谭，安迪S L”，标题=“吸烟者参与推特上关于电子烟使用相对危害的信息和错误信息的可能性:来自随机对照试验的结果”，期刊=“JMIR公共卫生监测”，年=“2021”，月=“12”，日=“21”，卷=“7”，数=“12”，页=“e27183”，关键词=“电子烟;错误信息;推特;背景:互联网上关于电子烟危害的信息和错误信息可能会增加吸烟者对电子烟的误解。关于吸烟者对社交媒体上关于电子烟的信息和错误信息的参与度的研究有限。目的:这项研究评估了吸烟者参与(定义为回复、转发、点赞和分享)包含关于电子烟危害的信息、错误信息和不确定性的推文的可能性。方法:我们在2400名过去30天内没有吸电子烟的英国和美国成年吸烟者中进行了一项基于网络的随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配在以下四种情况之一下查看四条推文:(1)电子烟与吸烟一样有害或更有害，(2)电子烟完全无害，(3)不确定电子烟的危害，或(4)控制(体育活动)。结果衡量标准是参与者参与推文的可能性，包括他们是否回复、转发、点赞和分享每条推文的总和。 We fitted Poisson regression models to predict the likelihood of engagement with tweets among 974 Twitter users and 1287 non-Twitter social media users, adjusting for covariates and stratified by UK and US participants. Results: Among Twitter users, participants were more likely to engage with tweets in condition 1 (e-cigarettes are as harmful or more harmful than smoking) than in condition 2 (e-cigarettes are completely harmless). Among other social media users, participants were more likely to likely to engage with tweets in condition 1 than in conditions 2 and 3 (e-cigarettes are completely harmless and uncertainty about e-cigarette harms). Conclusions: Tweets stating information and misinformation that e-cigarettes were as harmful or more harmful than smoking regular cigarettes may receive higher engagement than tweets indicating e-cigarettes were completely harmless. Trial Registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 16082420; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16082420 ", issn="2369-2960", doi="10.2196/27183", url="https://publichealth.www.mybigtv.com/2021/12/e27183", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/27183", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34931999" }