@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/34549，作者=“Clavier, Thomas和Occhiali, Emilie和Guenet, Claire和Vannier, Naurine和Hache, Camille和Compere, Vincent和Selim, Jean和Besnier, Emmanuel”，标题=“2021年国家麻醉学会在四大社交网络上的全球存在:观察性案例研究”，期刊=“JMIR Perioper Med”，年=“2022”，月=“7月”，日=“20”，卷=“5”，数=“1”，页=“e34549”，关键词=“社交网络，社交媒体;麻醉;社会;Facebook;推特;Instagram;背景:尽管医学学会在社交网络(SNs)上的存在对于传播专业信息可能很有趣，但目前还没有研究调查他们在社交网络上的存在。目的:这一观点的目的是描述国家麻醉学会在SNs上的世界性存在和活动。方法:本观察性研究评估了世界麻醉医师学会联合会成员学会在SNs Twitter、Facebook、Instagram和YouTube上的活跃度(在收集日期前一年≥1条帖子)。我们在世界麻醉学会联合会网站上收集了关于每个麻醉学会的数据。 Results: Among the 136 societies, 66 (48.5{\%}) had an active presence on at least one SN. The most used SN was Facebook (n=60, 44.1{\%}), followed by Twitter (n=37, 27.2{\%}), YouTube (n=26, 19.1{\%}), and Instagram (n=16, 11.8{\%}). The SN with the largest number of followers was Facebook for 52 (78.8{\%}) societies and Twitter for 12 (18.2{\%}) societies. The number of followers was 361 (IQR 75-1806) on Twitter, 2494 (IQR 1049-5369) on Facebook, 1400 (IQR 303-3058) on Instagram, and 214 (IQR 33-955) on YouTube. There was a strong correlation between the number of posts and the number of followers on Twitter (r=0.95, 95{\%} CI 0.91-0.97; P<.001), Instagram (r=0.83, 95{\%} CI 0.58-0.94; P<.001), and YouTube (r=0.69, 95{\%} CI 0.42-0.85; P<.001). According to the density of anesthetists in the country, there was no difference between societies with and without active SN accounts. Conclusions: Less than half of national anesthesia societies have at least one active account on SNs. Twitter and Facebook are the most used SNs. ", issn="2561-9128", doi="10.2196/34549", url="https://periop.www.mybigtv.com/2022/1/e34549", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/34549", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35857379" }