TY -的AU -普劳斯,瑞秋盟——Carsley莎拉PY - 2021 DA - 2021/11/25 TI -数字干预促进儿童健康饮食:伞审查乔- JMIR Pediatr父SP - e30160六世- 4 - 4 KW -儿童KW -健康饮食KW -电子健康KW -营养干预KW -营养教育KW -食品识字KW -数字健康KW -虚拟交付KW -数字干预KW -营养干预KW -最佳实践KW -教育KW -手机AB -背景:在COVID-19大流行期间，电子医疗和基于web的服务交付变得越来越普遍。数字干预可能对年轻人极具吸引力;然而，与通常的面对面干预相比，它们的有效性尚不清楚。随着营养干预与数字世界的融合，有必要确定儿童数字干预的最佳实践。目的:本研究的目的是检查数字营养干预对儿童饮食结果的有效性，与现有干预措施(如传统的面对面编程或非数字支持)相比。方法:我们对有资格纳入的研究进行了系统性综述，这些研究评估了旨在改善18岁以下儿童食品和营养结果的数字干预的主要研究，与传统营养教育相比。结果:共纳入2015年以来发表的11篇系统综述(7/11,64%，质量中等)。数字干预包括互联网、计算机或移动干预，网站、程序、应用程序、电子邮件、视频、cd - rom、游戏、远程医疗、短信短信和社交媒体，或它们的组合。干预的剂量和持续时间差异很大(单次或多次暴露; 1-60 minutes). Many studies have been informed by theory or used behavior change techniques (eg, feedback, goal-setting, and tailoring). The effect of digital nutrition interventions for children on dietary outcomes is small and inconsistent. Digital interventions seemed to be the most promising for improving fruit and vegetable intake compared with other nutrition outcomes; however, reviews have found mixed results. Conclusions: Owing to the heterogeneity and duration of digital interventions, follow-up evaluations, comparison groups, and outcomes measured, the effectiveness of these interventions remains unclear. High-quality evidence with common definitions for digital intervention types evaluated with validated measures is needed to improve the state of evidence, to inform policy and program decisions for health promotion in children. Now is the time for critical, robust evaluation of the adopted digital interventions during and after the COVID-19 pandemic to establish best practices for nutrition interventions for children. SN - 2561-6722 UR - https://pediatrics.www.mybigtv.com/2021/4/e30160 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/30160 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842561 DO - 10.2196/30160 ID - info:doi/10.2196/30160 ER -