%0杂志文章%@ 2561- 6722% I JMIR出版物%V 4%卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析 N 4% P e30160% T促进儿童健康饮食的数字干预:A普鲁斯，雷切尔·卡斯莱，萨拉+社区卫生和人文学部，纽芬兰纪念大学，300菲利普亲王路，圣约翰，NL, A1B 3V6，加拿大，1 709 864 6622，rprowse@mun.ca %K儿童%K健康饮食%K电子健康%K营养干预%K营养教育%K食品扫盲%K数字健康%K虚拟递送%K数字干预%K营养干预%K最佳做法%K教育%K手机%D 2021 %7 25.11.2021 %9回顾%J JMIR儿童家长%G英语%X背景:在COVID-19大流行期间，电子健康和基于网络的服务递送已变得越来越普遍。数字干预可能对年轻人极具吸引力;然而，与通常的面对面干预相比，它们的有效性尚不清楚。随着营养干预与数字世界的融合，有必要确定儿童数字干预的最佳实践。目的:本研究的目的是检查数字营养干预对儿童饮食结果的有效性，与现有干预措施(如传统的面对面编程或非数字支持)相比。方法:我们对有资格纳入的研究进行了系统性综述，这些研究评估了旨在改善18岁以下儿童食品和营养结果的数字干预的主要研究，与传统营养教育相比。结果:共纳入2015年以来发表的11篇系统综述(7/11,64%，质量中等)。数字干预包括互联网、计算机或移动干预，网站、程序、应用程序、电子邮件、视频、cd - rom、游戏、远程医疗、短信短信和社交媒体，或它们的组合。 The dose and duration of the interventions varied widely (single to multiple exposures; 1-60 minutes). Many studies have been informed by theory or used behavior change techniques (eg, feedback, goal-setting, and tailoring). The effect of digital nutrition interventions for children on dietary outcomes is small and inconsistent. Digital interventions seemed to be the most promising for improving fruit and vegetable intake compared with other nutrition outcomes; however, reviews have found mixed results. Conclusions: Owing to the heterogeneity and duration of digital interventions, follow-up evaluations, comparison groups, and outcomes measured, the effectiveness of these interventions remains unclear. High-quality evidence with common definitions for digital intervention types evaluated with validated measures is needed to improve the state of evidence, to inform policy and program decisions for health promotion in children. Now is the time for critical, robust evaluation of the adopted digital interventions during and after the COVID-19 pandemic to establish best practices for nutrition interventions for children. %M 34842561 %R 10.2196/30160 %U https://pediatrics.www.mybigtv.com/2021/4/e30160 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/30160 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842561