TY -的盟Zelmer Jennifer AU -范霍夫Krystle AU - Notarianni,玛丽安非盟- van Mierlo特盟——Schellenberg梅根AU -坦南鲍姆,双重卡拉PY - 2018 DA - 2018/07/09 TI -评估框架e-Mental健康应用在加拿大:结果修改德尔福过程乔——JMIR Mhealth Uhealth SP - e10016六世- 6 - 7 KW -心理健康KW -手机应用KW -共识KW——德尔福过程KW -评估框架KW -远程医疗AB -背景:心理健康电子应用程序的数量正在迅速增加。研究表明，使用一些应用程序是有益的，而其他应用程序则无效或不符合用户的隐私期望。个人和组织，策划，推荐，托管，使用，或支付应用程序有兴趣根据可用性和有效性的共识标准分类应用程序。其他人之前发布了评估健康相关应用程序的建议;然而，这些建议在多大程度上可以在不同人群(如文化、性别和语言)中推广仍不清楚。本研究描述了加拿大利益攸关方开发电子心理健康评估框架的尝试，该框架以循证方式响应生活在加拿大的人的独特需求。目的:我们研究的目的是实现广泛的加拿大利益相关者对评估加拿大电子心理健康应用程序框架的指导原则和标准的共识。方法:我们通过对现有应用评估框架的快速审查和环境扫描，制定了一套初步的指导原则和标准。最初的名单是通过两轮改进的德尔菲过程来改进的。 Participants (N=25) included app developers and users, health care providers, mental health advocates, people with lived experience of a mental health problem or mental illness, policy makers, and researchers. Consensus on each guideline or criterion was defined a priori as at least 70% agreement. The first round of voting was conducted electronically. Prior to Round 2 voting, in-person presentations from experts and a persona empathy mapping process were used to explore the perspectives of diverse stakeholders. Results: Of all respondents, 68% (17/25) in Round 1 and 100% (13/13) in Round 2 agreed that a framework for evaluating health apps is needed to help Canadian consumers identify high-quality apps. Consensus was reached on 9 guiding principles: evidence based, gender responsive, culturally appropriate, user centered, risk based, internationally aligned, enabling innovation, transparent and fair, and based on ethical norms. In addition, 15 informative and evaluative criteria were defined to assess the effectiveness, functionality, clinical applicability, interoperability, usability, transparency regarding security and privacy, security or privacy standards, supported platforms, targeted users, developers’ transparency, funding transparency, price, user desirability, user inclusion, and meaningful inclusion of a diverse range of communities. Conclusions: Canadian mental health stakeholders reached the consensus on a framework of 9 guiding principles and 15 criteria important in assessing e-mental health apps. What differentiates the Canadian framework from other scales is explicit attention to user inclusion at all stages of the development, gender responsiveness, and cultural appropriateness. Furthermore, an empathy mapping process markedly influenced the development of the framework. This framework may be used to inform future mental health policies and programs. SN - 2291-5222 UR - http://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2018/7/e10016/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/10016 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29986846 DO - 10.2196/10016 ID - info:doi/10.2196/10016 ER -