TY -非盟的陈,朱莉安娜盟——凯德,珍妮特•E AU - Allman-Farinelli玛格丽特PY - 2015 DA - 2015/12/16 TI -减肥的最受欢迎的智能手机应用程序:一个质量评估乔- JMIR mHealth uHealth SP - e104六世- 3 - 4 KW -行为改变技术KW -评价KW -肥胖KW -质量KW -智能手机应用KW -体重管理AB -背景:手机技术的进步导致了智能手机的发展和运行应用程序的能力。大量与健康和健身相关的智能手机应用程序的可用性，在临床和公共健康层面都有可能促进健康行为的改变和体重管理。然而，目前该领域的顶级应用在科学质量和行为理论证据基础上都没有得到广泛的评价。目的:本研究的目的是评估商业市场上最受欢迎的膳食减肥智能手机应用程序的质量，使用综合质量评估标准，并量化纳入的行为改变技术(bct)。方法:在2014年8月，从澳大利亚谷歌Play和iTunes App Store的免费和付费部分(n=800)中筛选出排名前200的健康和健身类应用。为了被纳入进一步的分析，一款应用必须专注于体重管理，包括记录饮食摄入的功能(自我监测)，并且是英文的。一名研究人员下载并使用了合格的应用程序5天，并根据质量评估标准评估应用程序，包括以下领域:问责性、与体重管理相关的信息的科学覆盖率和内容准确性、技术增强的功能、可用性和bct的合并。为了评估人员之间的可靠性，另一名评估人员对30%的应用程序进行了评级。通过与3天称重食物记录(WFR)的结果比较，进一步调查了app能量摄入计算的准确性。结果:在所有合格的应用程序(n=28)中，只有1个应用程序(4%)在问责性方面获得满分。 Overall, apps included an average of 5.1 (SD 2.3) out of 14 technology-enhanced features, and received a mean score of 13.5 (SD 3.7) out of 20 for usability. The majority of apps provided estimated energy requirements (24/28, 86%) and used a food database to calculate energy intake (21/28, 75%). When compared against the WFR, the mean absolute energy difference of apps which featured energy intake calculations (23/28, 82%) was 127 kJ (95% CI -45 to 299). An average of 6.3 (SD 3.7) of 26 BCTs were included. Conclusions: Overall, the most popular commercial apps for weight management are suboptimal in quality, given the inadequate scientific coverage and accuracy of weight-related information, and the relative absence of BCTs across the apps reviewed. With the limited regulatory oversight around the quality of these types of apps, this evaluation provides clinicians and consumers an informed view of the highest-quality apps in the current popular app pool appropriate for recommendation and uptake. Further research is necessary to assess the effectiveness of apps for weight management. SN - 2291-5222 UR - http://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2015/4/e104/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4334 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26678569 DO - 10.2196/mhealth.4334 ID - info:doi/10.2196/mhealth.4334 ER -