TY - JOUR AU - Tsvyatkova, Damyanka AU - Buckley, Jim AU - Beecham, Sarah AU - Chochlov, Muslim AU - O 'Keeffe, Ian R AU - Razzaq, Abdul AU - Rekanar, Kaavya AU - Richardson, Ita AU - Welsh, Thomas AU - Storni, Cristiano PY - 2022 DA - 2022/3/11 TI - COVID-19数字接触者追踪应用程序:以公民为中心的评估框架JO - JMIR Mhealth Uhealth SP - e30691 VL - 10 IS - 3kw - COVID-19 KW - Mhealth KW -数字接触追踪应用程序KW -框架KW -评估KW -移动健康KW -健康应用程序KW -数字健康KW -接触追踪AB -背景:COVID-19的无声传播导致致命感染呈指数级增长。由于全球有400多万人死亡，控制和遏制传播的需求从未如此迫切。新型COVID-19疫苗带来了希望。然而，给药时间表、长期保护和对潜在变异的有效性仍然未知。在这种情况下，接触者追踪和数字接触者追踪应用程序(cta)继续提供一种机制，帮助遏制传播，保护人们的安全，并帮助启动经济。然而，cta必须解决一系列经常相互冲突的问题，这使得它们的开发/演变变得复杂。例如，该应用程序必须保护公民的隐私，同时收集他们的密切接触者和尽可能多的流行病学信息。目的:在这项研究中，我们得出了一个比较对比的cta评估框架，该框架整合并扩展了该领域的现有工作，特别关注公民收养;我们称这个框架为cta的以公民为中心的比较对比评估框架(C3EF)。 Methods: The framework was derived using an iterative approach. First, we reviewed the literature on CTAs and mobile health app evaluations, from which we derived a preliminary set of attributes and organizing pillars. These attributes and the probing questions that we formulated were iteratively validated, augmented, and refined by applying the provisional framework against a selection of CTAs. Each framework pillar was then subjected to internal cross-team scrutiny, where domain experts cross-checked sufficiency, relevancy, specificity, and nonredundancy of the attributes, and their organization in pillars. The consolidated framework was further validated on the selected CTAs to create a finalized version of C3EF for CTAs, which we offer in this paper. Results: The final framework presents seven pillars exploring issues related to CTA design, adoption, and use: (General) Characteristics, Usability, Data Protection, Effectiveness, Transparency, Technical Performance, and Citizen Autonomy. The pillars encompass attributes, subattributes, and a set of illustrative questions (with associated example answers) to support app design, evaluation, and evolution. An online version of the framework has been made available to developers, health authorities, and others interested in assessing CTAs. Conclusions: Our CTA framework provides a holistic compare-and-contrast tool that supports the work of decision-makers in the development and evolution of CTAs for citizens. This framework supports reflection on design decisions to better understand and optimize the design compromises in play when evolving current CTAs for increased public adoption. We intend this framework to serve as a foundation for other researchers to build on and extend as the technology matures and new CTAs become available. SN - 2291-5222 UR - https://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2022/3/e30691 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/30691 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084338 DO - 10.2196/30691 ID - info:doi/10.2196/30691 ER -