@Article{信息:doi/10.2196/13844，作者=“Steeb, Theresa和Wessely, Anja和Mastnik, Sebastian和Brinker, Titus Josef和French, Lars Einar和Niesert, ann - charlotte和Berking, Carola和Heppt, Markus Vincent”，标题=“患者态度和他们对皮肤癌的认识——相关应用程序:横断面调查”，期刊=“JMIR Mhealth Uhealth”，年=“2019”，月=“7”，日=“02”，卷=“7”，数=“7”，页=“e13844”，关键词=“皮肤癌;黑色素瘤;移动应用程序;远程医疗;意识;背景:在数字化和电子健康的新兴时代，皮肤癌相关的应用程序是支持皮肤科咨询和检查的有用工具。然而，人们对患者如何看待这些应用程序的价值知之甚少。目的:本研究的目的是调查患者对皮肤癌相关应用程序的态度和认知。方法:2018年9月至12月，在德国慕尼黑大学医院(LMU Munich)进行了一项横断面研究，包括200名肿瘤门诊患者。患者被要求完成一份自我管理的问卷，调查与健康和皮肤癌相关的应用程序的受欢迎程度和有用性。 A descriptive analysis was performed with the expression of categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. For continuous variables, the median and range were indicated. Contingency tables and chi-square tests were performed to investigate associations between sociodemographic data and selected items of the questionnaire. Results: A total of 98.9{\%} (195/197) of patients had never used skin cancer--related apps or could not remember. In 49.7{\%} (93/187) of cases, patients were unsure about the usefulness of skin cancer apps, whereas 42.6{\%} (78/183) thought that skin cancer apps could supplement or support the professional skin examination performed by a physician. However, 47.9{\%} (90/188) were interested in acquiring more information by their dermatologists about skin cancer apps. Young age (P=.002), male gender (P=.02), a previous history of melanoma (P=.004), and higher educational level (P=.002) were significantly associated with a positive attitude. Nevertheless, 55.9{\%} (105/188) preferred a printed patient brochure on skin cancer to downloading and using an app. Conclusions: The experience and knowledge of skin cancer--related apps was surprisingly low in this population, although there was a high general interest in more information about such apps. Printed patient brochures were the preferred information source. ", issn="2291-5222", doi="10.2196/13844", url="https://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2019/7/e13844/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/13844", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31267978" }