@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / /移动医疗。8211，作者=“Puri, Arjun and Kim, Ben and Nguyen, Olivier and Stolee, Paul and Tung, James and Lee, Joon”，标题=“社区老年人对腕带运动追踪器的用户接受度:混合方法研究”，期刊=“JMIR Mhealth Uhealth”，年=“2017”，月=“11”，日=“15”，卷=“5”，数=“11”，页=“e173”，关键词=“健康”;移动健康;健身追踪;背景:可穿戴式活动追踪器是一种新兴技术，有望成功支持就地老龄化。消费级可穿戴运动追踪器在市场上越来越普遍，但老年人对这些追踪器的态度、接受程度和自愿使用程度却知之甚少。目的:本研究的目的是利用文献和技术接受模型中确定的潜在影响因素，评估加拿大社区老年人对可穿戴活动追踪器的接受和使用情况。方法:采用混合方法设计。研究人员从安大略省西南部招募了20名55岁及以上的老年人。在交叉设计研究中，参与者在每个部分分别使用两种不同的可穿戴活动追踪器(小米小米手环和微软手环)，持续21天(即总共42天)。 A questionnaire was developed to capture acceptance and experience at the end of each segment, representing 2 different devices. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 4 participants, and a content analysis was performed. Results: Participants ranged in age from 55 years to 84 years (mean age: 64 years). The Mi Band gained higher levels of acceptance (16/20, 80{\%}) compared with the Microsoft Band (10/20, 50{\%}). The equipment characteristics dimension scored significantly higher for the Mi Band (P<.05). The amount a participant was willing to pay for the device was highly associated with technology acceptance (P<.05). Multivariate logistic regression with 3 covariates resulted in an area under the curve of 0.79. Content analysis resulted in the formation of the following main themes: (1) smartphones as facilitators of wearable activity trackers; (2) privacy is less of a concern for wearable activity trackers, (3) value proposition: self-awareness and motivation; (4) subjective norm, social support, and sense of independence; and (5) equipment characteristics matter: display, battery, comfort, and aesthetics. Conclusions: Older adults were mostly accepting of wearable activity trackers, and they had a clear understanding of its value for their lives. Wearable activity trackers were uniquely considered more personal than other types of technologies, thereby the equipment characteristics including comfort, aesthetics, and price had a significant impact on the acceptance. Results indicated that privacy was less of concern for older adults, but it may have stemmed from a lack of understanding of the privacy risks and implications. These findings add to emerging research that investigates acceptance and factors that may influence acceptance of wearable activity trackers among older adults. ", issn="2291-5222", doi="10.2196/mhealth.8211", url="http://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2017/11/e173/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8211", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141837" }