@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / /移动医疗。2733，作者=“Plaza, Inmaculada and Demarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva and Herrera-Mercadal, Paola and Garc{\'i}a-Campayo, Javier”，标题=“基于正心的移动应用:文献综述与当前特征分析”，期刊=“JMIR移动健康Uhealth”，年=“2013”，月=“11”，日=“01”，卷=“1”，数=“2”，页=“e24”，关键词=“移动健康;移动健康;正念;社交网络;个性化教育;卫生信息学;背景:对正念的兴趣呈指数增长，特别是在心理学和医学领域。正念的特征或状态与心理健康的几个指标显著相关，正念疗法在预防和治疗许多慢性疾病方面是有效的。人们对促进健康和疾病自我管理的移动应用程序的兴趣也在增长。 Despite the explosion of interest, research on both the design and potential uses of mindfulness-based mobile applications (MBMAs) is scarce. Objective: Our main objective was to study the features and functionalities of current MBMAs and compare them to current evidence-based literature in the health and clinical setting. Methods: We searched online vendor markets, scientific journal databases, and grey literature related to MBMAs. We included mobile applications that featured a mindfulness-based component related to training or daily practice of mindfulness techniques. We excluded opinion-based articles from the literature. Results: The literature search resulted in 11 eligible matches, two of which completely met our selection criteria--a pilot study designed to evaluate the feasibility of a MBMA to train the practice of ``walking meditation,'' and an exploratory study of an application consisting of mood reporting scales and mindfulness-based mobile therapies. The online market search eventually analyzed 50 available MBMAs. Of these, 8{\%} (4/50) did not work, thus we only gathered information about language, downloads, or prices. The most common operating system was Android. Of the analyzed apps, 30{\%} (15/50) have both a free and paid version. MBMAs were devoted to daily meditation practice (27/46, 59{\%}), mindfulness training (6/46, 13{\%}), assessments or tests (5/46, 11{\%}), attention focus (4/46, 9{\%}), and mixed objectives (4/46, 9{\%}). We found 108 different resources, of which the most used were reminders, alarms, or bells (21/108, 19.4{\%}), statistics tools (17/108, 15.7{\%}), audio tracks (15/108, 13.9{\%}), and educational texts (11/108, 10.2{\%}). Daily, weekly, monthly statistics, or reports were provided by 37{\%} (17/46) of the apps. 28{\%} (13/46) of them permitted access to a social network. No information about sensors was available. The analyzed applications seemed not to use any external sensor. English was the only language of 78{\%} (39/50) of the apps, and only 8{\%} (4/50) provided information in Spanish. 20{\%} (9/46) of the apps have interfaces that are difficult to use. No specific apps exist for professionals or, at least, for both profiles (users and professionals). We did not find any evaluations of health outcomes resulting from the use of MBMAs. Conclusions: While a wide selection of MBMAs seem to be available to interested people, this study still shows an almost complete lack of evidence supporting the usefulness of those applications. We found no randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of these applications on mindfulness training or health indicators, and the potential for mobile mindfulness applications remains largely unexplored. ", issn="2291-5222", doi="10.2196/mhealth.2733", url="http://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2013/2/e24/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.2733", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25099314" }