公众对网络引导疗法的态度:卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析网络调查研究%A Apolinário-Hagen,Jennifer %A Harrer,Mathias %A Kählke,Fanny %A Fritsche,Lara %A Salewski,Christel %A Ebert,David Daniel %+哈根大学健康心理学系心理研究所，Universitätsstraße 33，哈根，58097，德国，49 2331 987 2272,jennifer.apolinario-hagen@fernuni-hagen.de %K心理健康%K电子健康%K对电脑的态度%K患者偏好%K认知治疗%K对医疗保健的可接受性%K压力，背景:互联网干预已被提出，以提高循证心理治疗的可及性和使用率。然而，人们对这种疗法的态度知之甚少，这可能是使用它们的一个重要障碍。目的:本研究旨在(1)确定人们对指导性网络干预的态度;(2)与其他基于互联网的干预形式相比，评估其可接受性;(3)探索可接受性的预测因素。方法:一项基于便利样本的网络调查(N=646)评估了人们对指导性网络治疗的态度(即感知有用性和帮助性，以及相对于面对面治疗的优势)，对传递模式的偏好(即电子偏好:指导性网络干预、非指导性网络干预或视频会议心理治疗)，以及态度和偏好的潜在预测因素:社会人口统计学、寻求帮助相关变量、依恋风格和感知压力。结果:尽管大多数参与者认为网络干预是有用的或有帮助的(426/646,65.9%)，但少数参与者表示其相对于面对面治疗的优势(56/646,8.7%)。大多数参与者更喜欢有指导的网络干预(252/646,39.0%)，而不是视频会议心理治疗(147/646,22.8%)、无指导的网络干预(124/646,19.2%)和不使用网络干预(121/646,18.8%;缺失数据:1/646,0.2%)。依恋回避和压力与电子偏好相关(均P< 0.05)。 Moreover, preference for therapist-guided internet interventions was higher for individuals who were aware of internet-based treatment (χ26=12.8; P=.046). Conclusions: Participants assessed therapist-guided internet interventions as helpful, but not equivalent to face-to-face therapies. The vast majority (523/646, 81.0%) of the participants were potentially willing to use internet-based approaches. In lieu of providing patients with only one specific low-intensity treatment, implementation concepts should offer several options, including guided internet interventions, but not limited to them. Conversely, our results also indicate that efforts should focus on increasing public knowledge about internet interventions, including information about their effectiveness, to promote acceptance and uptake. %M 29764797 %R 10.2196/10735 %U http://mental.www.mybigtv.com/2018/2/e10735/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/10735 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764797