@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/34735，作者=“Taxter, Alysha和Johnson, Lisa和Tabussi, Doreen和Kimura, Yukiko和Donaldson, Brittany和Lawson, Erica和Del Gaizo, Vincent和Vitelli, Daniela和Pinter, Corinne和Van Citters, Aricca和Nelson, Eugene和Lee, Tzielan”，标题=“支持儿科风湿病联合护理的电子仪表板的联合设计:“以人为本的设计与可用性测试”，期刊=“J participation Med”，年份=“2022”，月份=“Apr”，日期=“22”，卷=“14”，数=“1”，页数=“e34735”，关键词=“以人为本的设计;合作生产;仪表板;儿科风湿病学;幼年特发性关节炎;佳;少年关节炎;病人为中心;patient-reported结果; patient communication; patient education; family education", abstract="Background: The coproduction of care involves patients and families partnering with their clinicians and care teams, with the premise that each brings their own perspective, knowledge, and expertise, as well as their own values, goals, and preferences, to the partnership. Dashboards can display meaningful patient and clinical data to assess how a patient is doing and inform shared decision-making. Increasing communication between patients and care teams is particularly important for children with chronic conditions. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the most common chronic pediatric rheumatic condition, is associated with increased pain, decreased function, and decreased quality of life. Objective: The aim of this study is to design a dashboard prototype for use in coproducing care in patients with JIA. We evaluated the use and needs of end users, obtained a consensus on the necessary dashboard data elements, and constructed display prototypes to inform meaningful discussions for coproduction. Methods: A human-centered design approach involving parents, patients, clinicians, and care team members was used to develop a dashboard to support the coproduction of care in 4 ambulatory pediatric rheumatology clinics. We engaged a multidisciplinary team (n=18) of patients, parents, clinicians, nurses, and staff during an in-person kick-off meeting followed by biweekly meetings. We also leveraged advisory panels. Teams mapped workflows and patient journeys, created personas, and developed dashboard sketches. The final dashboard components were determined via Delphi consensus voting. Low-tech dashboard testing was completed during clinic visits, and visual display prototypes were iterated by using the Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology. Patients and clinicians were surveyed regarding their experiences. Results: Teams achieved consensus on what data mattered most at the point of care to support patients with JIA, families, and clinicians collaborating to make the best possible health care decisions. Notable themes included the right data in the right place at the right time, data in once for multiple purposes, patient and family self-management components, and the opportunity for education and increased transparency. A final set of 11 dashboard data elements was identified, including patient-reported outcomes, clinical data, and medications. Important design considerations featured the incorporation of real-time data, clearly labeled graphs, and vertical orientation to facilitate review and discussion. Prototype paper-testing with 36 patients and families yielded positive feedback, with 89{\%} (8/9) to 100{\%} (9/9) of parents (n=9) and 80{\%} (8/10) to 90{\%} (9/10) of clinicians (n=10) strongly agreeing or agreeing that the dashboard was useful during clinic discussions, helped to talk about what mattered most, and informed health care decision-making. Conclusions: We developed a dashboard prototype that displays patient-reported and clinical data over time, along with medications that can be used during a clinic visit to support meaningful conversations and shared decision-making among patients with JIA, their families, and their clinicians and care teams. ", issn="2152-7202", doi="10.2196/34735", url="https://jopm.www.mybigtv.com/2022/1/e34735", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/34735", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35133283" }