%0期刊文章%@ 2564-1891 %I JMIR出版物%V 2% 卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析N 2% P e39504% T在日本和印度尼西亚推特上监测COVID-19疫苗副作用的提及:信息流行病学研究%A Ferawati,Kiki %A Liew,Kongmeng %A Aramaki,Eiji %A Wakamiya,Shoko %+科学技术研究生院，奈良科学技术学院，8916-5,Takayama-cho, Ikoma, 630-0192, Japan, 81 743725250, wakamiya@is.naist.jp %K COVID-19 %K疫苗%K COVID-19疫苗%K辉瑞%K Moderna %K疫苗副作用%K副作用%K Twitter %K逻辑回归%D 2022 %7 4.10.2022 %9原始论文%J JMIR信息流行病学%G英文%X背景:2021年的特点是接种了COVID-19疫苗，这在普通人群中引发了更广泛的讨论，一些人支持接种疫苗，一些人反对接种疫苗。推特是一个受欢迎的社交媒体平台，在提供关于COVID-19疫苗的信息方面发挥了重要作用，并有效地观察了公众的反应。我们集中研究了日本和印度尼西亚的推特，这两个国家有大量的推特用户，对副作用的担忧一直被认为是犹豫接种疫苗的一个重要原因。目的:本研究旨在调查Twitter如何用于报告疫苗相关副作用，并比较辉瑞和Moderna在日本和印度尼西亚开发的2种信使RNA (mRNA)疫苗的副作用提及情况。方法:我们从Twitter上获取了2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间与COVID-19疫苗及其副作用相关的日语和印度尼西亚语关键词的推文数据。然后，我们删除了推文频率较高的用户，并将多个用户的推文合并为一句话，以专注于用户级别的分析，结果总共有214,165个用户(日本)和12,289个用户(印度尼西亚)。然后，我们过滤数据，选择只提到辉瑞或Moderna的推文，并删除同时提到这两家公司的推文。我们将副作用计数与辉瑞和Moderna公布的公开报告进行了比较。 Afterward, logistic regression models were used to compare the side effects for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for each country. Results: We observed some differences in the ratio of side effects between the public reports and tweets. Specifically, fever was mentioned much more frequently in tweets than would be expected based on the public reports. We also observed differences in side effects reported between Pfizer and Moderna vaccines from Japan and Indonesia, with more side effects reported for the Pfizer vaccine in Japanese tweets and more side effects with the Moderna vaccine reported in Indonesian tweets. Conclusions: We note the possible consequences of vaccine side effect surveillance on Twitter and information dissemination, in that fever appears to be over-represented. This could be due to fever possibly having a higher severity or measurability, and further implications are discussed. %M 36277140 %R 10.2196/39504 %U https://infodemiology.www.mybigtv.com/2022/2/e39504 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/39504 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277140