@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/41481，作者="Jacob, Christine and Bourke, Steven and Heuss, Sabina"，标题="从测试者到共同创造者——成功患者参与电子健康解决方案开发的价值和方法:定性专家访谈研究"，期刊="JMIR Hum Factors"，年="2022"，月=" 10月"，日="6"，卷="9"，数="4"，页数="e41481"，关键词="远程医疗;智能手机;移动电话;电子健康档案;公共卫生实践;技术;知觉;健康教育;移动健康;移动健康; telehealth; eHealth; patients; patient engagement; patient voice; patient empowerment", abstract="Background: Research has shown that patient engagement is most commonly done at the beginning of research or to test readily available prototypes and less commonly done in other phases such as the execution phases. Previous studies have reported that patients are usually assigned a consultative rather than a decision-making role in health service planning and evaluation. Objective: This study had 2 objectives: to better understand the challenges and opportunities in the inclusion of patients in the development of eHealth technologies and ideas on how to overcome the identified gaps and to create a research-based end-to-end practical blueprint that can guide the relevant stakeholders to successfully engage patients as cocreators in all human-centered design phases rather than mere testers of preplanned prototypes. Methods: Key informant interviews were conducted using in-depth semistructured interviews with 20 participants from 6 countries across Europe. This was followed by a focus group to validate the initial findings. Participants encompassed all the relevant stakeholder groups including patient experts, eHealth experts, health technology providers, clinicians, pharma executives, and health insurance experts. Results: This study shows that engaging patients in eHealth development can help provide different types of value; namely, identifying unmet needs, better usability and desirability, better fit into the patient journey, better adoption and stickiness, better health outcomes, advocacy and trust, a sense of purpose, and better health equity and access. However, the participants agreed that patients are usually engaged too late in the development process, mostly assuming a sounding role in testing a ready-made prototype. The justification for these gaps in engagement is driven by some prominent barriers, notably compliance risks, patient-related factors, power dynamics, patient engagement as lip service, poor value perception, lack of resources, mistrust, and inflexibility. On the positive side, the participants also reflected on facilitators for better patient engagement; for instance, engaging through engagement partners, novel approaches such as the rise of professional patient experts, embedding patients in development teams, expectation management, and professional moderation services. Conclusions: Overcoming the current gaps in patient engagement in eHealth development requires consolidated efforts from all stakeholders in a complex health care ecosystem. The shift toward more patient-driven eHealth development requires education and awareness; frameworks to monitor and evaluate the value of patient engagement; regulatory clarity and simplification; platforms to facilitate patient access and identification; patient incentivization, transparency, and trust; and a mindset shift toward value-based health care. ", issn="2292-9495", doi="10.2196/41481", url="https://humanfactors.www.mybigtv.com/2022/4/e41481", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/41481", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36102548" }