@文章{info:doi/ 10.2199 /37313，作者="Savoy, April和Patel, Himalaya和Shahid, Umber和Offner, Alexis D和Singh, Hardeep和Giardina, Traber D和Meyer, Ashley N D"，标题="增加临床医生参与卫生服务干预设计的电子协同设计(生态设计)讲习班:参与式设计方法"，期刊="JMIR Hum Factors"，年="2022"，月="Sep"，日="22"，卷="9"，数="3"，页数="e37313"，关键词="临床医生;社区参与式研究;网络设计;提供保健;健康干预;医生;初级卫生保健;背景:临床医生利益相关者的参与可以改进卫生保健干预措施的设计和实施。参与式设计方法，特别是协同设计方法，包含了利益相关者主导的耗时设计活动。相互竞争的工作需求和不断增加的工作量使临床医生对典型的参与式方法的承诺更加困难。 The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated barriers to clinician participation in such interventions. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore a web-based participatory design approach to conduct economical, electronic co-design (ECO-design) workshops with primary care clinicians. Methods: We adapted traditional in-person co-design workshops to web-based delivery and adapted co-design workshop series to fit within a single 1-hour session. We applied the ECO-design workshop approach to codevelop feedback interventions regarding abnormal test result follow-up in primary care. We conducted ECO-design workshops with primary care clinicians at a medical center in Southern Texas, using videoconferencing software. Each workshop focused on one of three types of feedback interventions: conversation guide, email template, and dashboard prototype. We paired electronic materials and software features to facilitate participant interactions, prototyping, and data collection. The workshop protocol included four main activities: problem identification, solution generation, prototyping, and debriefing. Two facilitators were assigned to each workshop and one researcher resolved technical problems. After the workshops, our research team met to debrief and evaluate workshops. Results: A total of 28 primary care clinicians participated in our ECO-design workshops. We completed 4 parallel workshops, each with 5-10 participants. We conducted traditional analyses and generated a clinician persona (ie, representative description) and user interface prototypes. We also formulated recommendations for future ECO-design workshop recruitment, technology, facilitation, and data collection. Overall, our adapted workshops successfully enabled primary care clinicians to participate without increasing their workload, even during a pandemic. Conclusions: ECO-design workshops are viable, economical alternatives to traditional approaches. This approach fills a need for efficient methods to involve busy clinicians in the design of health care interventions. ", issn="2292-9495", doi="10.2196/37313", url="https://humanfactors.www.mybigtv.com/2022/3/e37313", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/37313", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136374" }