@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/37204，作者=“Le{\'o}n, Maria Alejandra and Pannunzio, Valeria and Kleinsmann, Maaike”，标题=“围手术期远程患者监控对临床工作人员工作流程的影响:范围回顾”，期刊=“JMIR Hum Factors”，年=“2022”，月=“Jun”，日=“6”，卷=“9”，数=“2”，页数=“e37204”，关键词=“远程患者监控;远程控制;工作流;护士;医生;围手术期护理;围手术期医学;远程医疗;背景:远程患者监测(RPM)干预措施正越来越多地在卫生保健环境中实施，因为它们对不同的利益相关者都有好处。然而，在RPM研究和实践中，这些干预措施对临床工作人员工作流程的影响并不总是被考虑在内。 Objective: This review explored how contemporary RPM interventions affect clinical staff and their workflows in perioperative settings. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of recent articles reporting the impact of RPM interventions implemented in perioperative settings on clinical staff and their workflow. The databases accessed were Embase and PubMed. A qualitative analysis was performed to identify the main problems and advantages that RPM brings to staff, in addition to the approaches taken to evaluate the impact of those interventions. Different themes were identified in terms of the challenges of RPM for clinical staff as well as in terms of benefits, risk-reduction strategies, and methods for measuring the impact of these interventions on the workflow of clinical staff. Results: A total of 1063 papers were found during the initial search, of which 21 (1.98{\%}) met the inclusion criteria. Of the 21 included papers, 15 (71{\%}) focused on evaluating new RPM systems, 4 (19{\%}) focused on existing systems, and 2 (10{\%}) were reviews. Conclusions: The reviewed literature shows that the impact on staff work experience is a crucial factor to consider when developing and implementing RPM interventions in perioperative settings. However, we noticed both underdevelopment and lack of standardization in the methods for assessing the impact of these interventions on clinical staff and their workflow. On the basis of the reviewed literature, we recommend the development of more robust methods for evaluating the impact of RPM interventions on staff experience in perioperative care; the adoption of a stronger focus on transition management when introducing these interventions in clinical practice; and the inclusion of longer periods of assessment, including the evaluation of long-term goals. ", issn="2292-9495", doi="10.2196/37204", url="https://humanfactors.www.mybigtv.com/2022/2/e37204", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/37204", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35666574" }