@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/35744，作者=“傅春叶吕柳，xiakang和Mi Mingdi”，标题=“集体价值促进中国在社交媒体上分享预防接种信息的意愿:随机控制试验”，期刊=“JMIR Form Res”，年=“2022”，月=“10”，日=“4”，卷=“6”，数=“10”，页=“e35744”，关键词=“个人价值;集体价值;疫苗接种;message-sharing意愿;感知到的责任;错误信息;疫苗错误信息;公共卫生;流感疫苗;社交媒体; COVID-19", abstract="Background: The proliferation of vaccine misinformation on social media has seriously corrupted the public's confidence in vaccination. Proactively sharing provaccination messages on social media is a cost-effective way to enhance global vaccination rates and resist vaccine misinformation. However, few strategies for encouraging the public to proactively share vaccine-related knowledge on social media have been developed. Objective: This research examines the effect of value type (individual vs collective) and message framing (gain vs loss) on influenza vaccination intention (experiment 1) and the willingness to share provaccination messages (experiment 2) among Chinese adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary aim was to evaluate whether messages that emphasized collective value were more effective in increasing the willingness to share than messages that emphasized individual value. Methods: We enrolled 450 Chinese adults for experiment 1 (n=250, 55.6{\%}) and experiment 2 (n=200, 44.4{\%}). Participants were randomly assigned to individual-gain, individual-loss, collective-gain, or collective-loss conditions with regard to the message in each experiment using the online survey platform's randomization function. Experiment 1 also included a control group. The primary outcome was influenza vaccination intention in experiment 1 and the willingness to share provaccination messages in experiment 2. Results: The valid sample included 213 adults in experiment 1 (females: n=151, 70.9{\%}; mean age 29 [SD 9] years; at least some college education: n=202, 94.8{\%}; single: n=131, 61.5{\%}) and 171 adults in experiment 2 (females: n=106, 62.0{\%}; mean age 28 [SD 7] years; at least some college education: n=163, 95.3{\%}; single: n=95, 55.6{\%}). Influenza vaccination intention was stronger in the individual-value conditions than in the collective-value conditions (F3,166=4.96, P=.03, $\eta$2=0.03). The reverse result was found for the willingness to share provaccination messages (F3,165=6.87, P=.01, $\eta$2=0.04). Specifically, participants who received a message emphasizing collective value had a higher intention to share the message than participants who read a message emphasizing individual value (F3,165=6.87, P=.01, $\eta$2=0.04), and the perceived responsibility for message sharing played a mediating role (indirect effect=0.23, 95{\%} lower limit confidence interval [LLCI] 0.41, 95{\%} upper limit confidence interval [ULCI] 0.07). In addition, gain framing facilitated influenza vaccination intention more than loss framing (F3,166=5.96, P=.02, $\eta$2=0.04). However, experiment 2 did not find that message framing affected message-sharing willingness. Neither experiment found an interaction between value type and message framing. Conclusions: Strengthened individual value rather than collective value is more likely to persuade Chinese adults to vaccinate. However, these adults are more likely to share a message that emphasizes collective rather than individual value, and the perceived responsibility for message sharing plays a mediating role. ", issn="2561-326X", doi="10.2196/35744", url="https://formative.www.mybigtv.com/2022/10/e35744", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/35744", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36067417" }