TY -的AU -罗马,豪尔赫盟——Elpern大卫J PY - 2021 DA - 2021/7/22 TI -利益冲突“一次性”皮肤科出版物:打开支付数据库分析乔- JMIR北京医学SP - e30126六世- 4 - 2 KW -制药行业KW -继续医学教育KW -皮肤科KW -影响KW -支付KW -打开支付数据库KW -出版物KW -医学教育KW -补偿KW -咨询KW -皮肤科医生AB -背景:皮肤病学期刊、期刊、社论和新闻杂志是有影响力的资源，它们不受统一的监管，并受到制药行业的影响。这项研究评估了行业对常见皮肤病学出版物(包括“一次性”出版物)的医生编辑委员会成员的支付。目的:本研究的目的是描述行业向不同皮肤病学出版物编委会成员支付的程度和性质，以确定不同类型出版物之间的支付差异。方法:编委会成员名单是从3个月期间收到的临床皮肤病学出版物收集而来的。收集了2013年至2019年开放支付数据库的数据，并对支付数据进行了分析。结果:评估了10篇论文，分析了466名医生的支付数据。所有年份的总薪酬为75,622,369.64美元。咨询、咨询以外的服务以及旅行或住宿费用占支付的大部分。一小部分皮肤科医生获得了大部分报酬。 The top payers were manufacturers of biologic medications. Payment amounts were higher for throwaway publications compared to peer-reviewed journals. Conclusions: Editorial board members of dermatology publications received substantial payments from the pharmaceutical industry. A minority of physicians receive the lion’s share of payments from industry. “Throwaway” publications have more financial conflict of interest than do peer-reviewed journals. The impact of these conflicts of interest on patient care, physicians' practice patterns, and patient perception of physicians is noteworthy. SN - 2562-0959 UR - https://derma.www.mybigtv.com/2021/2/e30126 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/30126 DO - 10.2196/30126 ID - info:doi/10.2196/30126 ER -