“一次性”皮肤病学出版物中的利益冲突:卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析开放支付数据库分析%A Roman,Jorge %A Elpern,David J %+ the Ronald O. Perelman纽约大学格罗斯曼医学院皮肤科，纽约东38街240号11楼，纽约州，10016，美国，1 2122635889jorge.roman@nyulangone.org %K制药行业%K继续医学教育%K皮肤科%K影响%K支付%K开放支付数据库%K出版物%K医学教育%K薪酬%K咨询%K皮肤科医生%D 2021 %7 22.7.2021 %9原始论文%J JMIR Dermatol %G英语%X皮肤病学期刊、期刊、社论和新闻杂志是有影响力的资源，没有统一的监管，受到制药行业的影响。本研究评估了行业对普通皮肤科出版物(包括“一次性”出版物)的医师编辑委员会成员的支付。目的:本研究的目的是表征的程度和性质的行业支付给编辑委员会成员不同的皮肤病学出版物，以确定不同类型的出版物之间的支付差异。方法:编辑委员会成员名单从收集临床皮肤病学出版物超过3个月的时间编制。收集开放支付数据库2013 - 2019年的数据，并对支付数据进行分析。结果:评估了10份出版物，分析了466名医生的支付数据。所有年份的补偿总额为75,622,369.64美元。 Consulting, services other than consulting, and travel or lodging payments constituted most of the payments. A fraction of dermatologists received the majority of payments. The top payers were manufacturers of biologic medications. Payment amounts were higher for throwaway publications compared to peer-reviewed journals. Conclusions: Editorial board members of dermatology publications received substantial payments from the pharmaceutical industry. A minority of physicians receive the lion’s share of payments from industry. “Throwaway” publications have more financial conflict of interest than do peer-reviewed journals. The impact of these conflicts of interest on patient care, physicians' practice patterns, and patient perception of physicians is noteworthy. %R 10.2196/30126 %U https://derma.www.mybigtv.com/2021/2/e30126 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/30126