英国皮肤科医生协会为皮肤病患者提供的社会心理支持网站卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析混合方法评估%A Heapy,Connor %A Montgomery,Kerry %A erser,Steven %A Gass,Matt %A Goad,Nina %A Thompson,Andrew R %+加的夫和谷大学健康委员会/加的夫大学，南威尔士临床心理学培训，加的夫公园广场70号塔楼11楼，cf103at，英国，44 292 087 0582;thompsona18@cardiff.ac.uk %K皮肤科%K心理学%K调查和问卷%K访谈%K手机%D 2020 %7 15.6.2020 %9背景:缺乏对皮肤状况个体的心理支持，并且很少有低强度的自助干预。目的:本研究旨在检验支持网站及其内嵌自助资源的可接受性和可用性。方法:采用混合方法。共有583名参与者(426名有皮肤问题的人，97名亲戚和朋友，60名皮肤科专家)浏览了英国皮肤科医生协会的皮肤支持网站，然后完成了一项关于他们的健康状况和网站可用性的调查。由816名参与者组成的对照组也完成了幸福感测量。总共有37名参与者(19名患有皮肤病的人，以及患有皮肤病的人的亲戚和朋友，18名皮肤科专业人士)浏览了SkinSupport网站，然后参加了焦点小组。参与者是通过社交媒体、专业网络和志愿者名单招募的。调查数据采用描述性和推断性统计和定性内容分析进行分析。 Results: Both quantitative and qualitative responses suggest that the SkinSupport website was viewed positively by both patients and health professionals. Overall, 79.8% (417/523) of individuals with a skin condition, and the relatives and friends of individuals with a skin condition, said that they would use the website again; and 86.7% (52/60) of dermatology professionals said that they would recommend the site to somebody with a skin condition. Qualitative responses related to the website fell into 4 key themes: (1) appearance, (2) use and navigation, (3) information, and (4) areas for development. Conclusions: The SkinSupport website was considered acceptable and usable. A range of areas requiring modification were identified. The website provides a useful resource that patients can access freely. Given the lack of services available to patients with skin conditions, health care professionals could routinely inform patients of this resource at assessment. %R 10.2196/17052 %U http://derma.www.mybigtv.com/2020/1/e17052/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/17052