TY - JOUR AU - Hathaway, Cassandra A AU - Chavez, Melody N AU - Kadono, Mika AU - Ketcher, Dana AU - Rollison, Dana E AU - Siegel, Erin M AU - Peoples, Anita R AU - Ulrich, Cornelia M AU - Penedo, Frank J AU - Tworoger, Shelley S AU - Gonzalez, Brian D PY - 2021 DA - 201/8/6 TI -在COVID-19大流行期间提高癌症中心患者的电子调查回复率:混合方法试点研究JO - JMIR癌症SP - e30265 VL - 7 IS - 3kw -应答率KW -电子调查KW -癌症KW - COVID-19 KW -大流行KW -监测KW -癌症患者KW -健康促进KW -数字健康KW -患者体验KW -健康结果AB -背景:调查在癌症研究中起着至关重要的作用。在COVID-19大流行期间，使用电子调查对于增进对患者体验的了解至关重要。然而，电子调查的回复率往往低于纸质调查。目的:本研究的目的是确定在COVID-19大流行期间提高对癌症中心患者进行电子调查的响应率的最佳方法。方法:我们通过电子邮件联系了2750名过去5年在莫菲特癌症中心就诊的患者，以完成一项关于他们在COVID-19大流行期间经历的调查，患者随机分配到一系列预先通知(如明信片、信件)或激励措施(如小礼物、中等礼品卡)。总共评估了8种组合。通过定性访谈了解患者对调查的理解程度和负担程度，通过定量分析评估各条件间的反应率。结果:共有262例患者(9.5%)完成调查，9例患者参加了定性访谈。访谈揭示了在理解或负担方面的最小障碍，这导致了调查设计的微小变化。 Compared to sending an email only, sending a postcard or letter prior to the email improved response rates from 3.7% to 9.8%. Similarly, inclusion of an incentive significantly increased the response rate from 5.4% to 16.7%, especially among racial (3.0% to 12.2%) and ethnic (6.4% to 21.0%) minorities, as well as among patients with low socioeconomic status (3.1% to 14.9%). Conclusions: Strategies to promote effective response rates include prenotification postcards or letters as well as monetary incentives. This work can inform future survey development to increase response rates for electronic surveys, particularly among hard-to-reach populations. SN - 2369-1999 UR - https://cancer.www.mybigtv.com/2021/3/e30265 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/30265 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34156965 DO - 10.2196/30265 ID - info:doi/10.2196/30265 ER -