杂志文章@ 2369-1999 I JMIR出版物作为基底细胞癌信息来卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析源的YouTube视频的质量、可理解性和可靠性评估:网络分析%A Steeb,Theresa %A Reinhardt,Lydia %A Harlaß，Matthias %A Heppt,Markus Vincent %A Meier,Friedegund %A Berking,Carola %+皮肤科，Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen, 91054, Germany, 49 9131 8545852，Theresa.Steeb@uk-erlangen.de %K基底细胞癌%K YouTube %K视频%K患者教育%K共享决策%K质量%K可靠性%K互联网%K信息%D 2022 %7 11.3.2022 %9原创论文%J JMIR癌症%G英语%X背景:皮肤癌患者越来越多地通过在线视频获取疾病相关信息。到目前为止，还没有对讲德语的基底细胞癌(BCC)患者的视频质量进行科学评估。目的:在本研究中，我们旨在识别和评估YouTube上提供的关于BCC的视频。方法:于2020年7月在YouTube上进行视频搜索，使用德语bcc相关关键词(例如，“Basalzellkarzinom”，“Basaliom”，“weißer hautkrebs”和“heller hautkrebs”)。前三页(即60个视频)由两个独立的研究人员对每个关键字进行搜索。两名作者评估了符合预定义资格标准的视频。使用DISCERN工具和全球质量量表(GQS)评估视频信息的质量。使用患者教育材料视听材料评估工具(PEMAT-A/V)评估患者教育材料的可理解性和可操作性。 The reliability was assessed with the JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) criteria score. Subgroup differences were identified using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: A total of 41 videos were included in the evaluation. The mean assessment scores were as follows: DISCERN, 3.3 (SD 0.80); GQS, 3.8 (SD 1.1); JAMA, 27.74% (SD 22.1%); understandability, 70.8% (SD 13.3%); and actionability, 45.9% (SD 43.7%). These values indicated that the videos were of medium to good quality and had good understandability, low actionability, and poor reliability. The quality of videos provided by health professionals was significantly higher than that of videos provided by laypersons. Conclusions: Optimization of health-related videos about BCC is desirable. In particular, adaptation to reliability criteria is necessary to support patient education and increase transparency. %M 35275067 %R 10.2196/29581 %U https://cancer.www.mybigtv.com/2022/1/e29581 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/29581 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35275067