%0期刊文章@ 1438- 8871% I JMIR出版物%V 23%卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析 N 10% P e24722% T数字技术辅助癌症患者的支持性护理干预:系统回顾%A Marthick,Michael %A McGregor,Deborah %A Alison,Jennifer %A Cheema,Birinder %A Dhillon,Haryana %A Shaw,Tim %+实施科学和电子健康小组研究，悉尼大学医学与健康学院，约翰霍普金斯大学查尔斯帕金斯中心，坎珀当博士，2006年，澳大利亚，61 (02)9351 2222，mmar7320@uni.sydney.edu.au %K数字卫生%K远程卫生%K电子卫生%K肿瘤%K支持护理%K系统综述%K手机%D 2021 %7 29.10.2021 %9综述%J J医疗互联网Res %G英文%X背景:虽然相对较新，但数字卫生干预措施正表现出快速增长，因为它们能够促进访问和克服地点、时间、健康状况等问题，以及最近的重大流行病的影响。随着数字技术的日益普及，数字卫生有可能改善支持性癌症护理的提供。目的:本系统综述旨在评估支持癌症治疗的数字健康干预措施。方法:系统检索MEDLINE、PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane中央对照试验登记册和Scopus等2000 - 2020年发表的文献。符合条件的出版物是临床医生主导的数字健康干预的随机对照试验，以支持成年癌症患者。所包括的干预措施是通过应用数字卫生概念模型确定的。使用修订的Cochrane偏倚风险工具对研究进行质量评价。结果:20个随机对照试验符合分析的纳入标准。 Interventions varied by duration, frequency, degree of technology use, and applied outcome measures. Interventions targeting a single tumor stream, predominantly breast cancer, and studies involving the implementation of remote symptom monitoring have dominated the results. In most studies, digital intervention resulted in significant positive outcomes in patient-reported symptoms, levels of fatigue and pain, health-related quality of life, functional capacity, and depression levels compared with the control. Conclusions: Digital health interventions are helpful and effective for supportive care of patients with cancer. There is a need for high-quality research. Future endeavors could focus on the use of valid, standardized outcome measures, maintenance of methodological rigor, and strategies to improve patient and health professional engagement in the design and delivery of supportive digital health interventions. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020149730; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=149730 %M 34714246 %R 10.2196/24722 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2021/10/e24722 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/24722 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714246

map