@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/34657，作者="Ramachandran, Hadassah Joann and Jiang, Ying and Teo, Jun Yi Claire and Yeo, Tee Joo and Wang, Wenru"，标题="冠心病患者居家心脏远程康复方案的技术接受度:系统范围综述"，期刊="J Med Internet Res"，年="2022"，月="Jan"，日="7"，卷="24"，数="1"，页数="e34657"，关键词="技术接受度;冠心病;以家庭为基础的;telerehabilitation;基于web的;移动应用程序;验收;心;康复;应用程序; review; evaluation; cardiac; cardiology; perspective; usability; acceptability", abstract="Background: An understanding of the technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs is paramount if they are to be designed and delivered to target the needs and preferences of patients with coronary heart disease; however, the current state of technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation has not been systematically evaluated in the literature. Objective: We aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation technology acceptance in terms of (1) the timing and approaches used and (2) patients' perspectives on its usability, utility, acceptability, acceptance, and external variables. Methods: We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus (inception to July 2021) for English-language papers that reported empirical evidence on the technology acceptance of early-phase home-based cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease. Content analysis was undertaken. Results: The search identified 1798 studies, of which 18 studies, with 14 unique home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs, met eligibility criteria. Technology acceptance (of the home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs) was mostly evaluated at intra- and posttrial stages using questionnaires (n=10) and usage data (n=11). The least used approach was evaluation through qualitative interviews (n=3). Usability, utility, acceptability, and acceptance were generally favored. External variables that influenced home-based cardiac telerehabilitation usage included component quality, system quality, facilitating conditions, and intrinsic factors. Conclusions: Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation usability, utility, acceptability, and acceptance were high; yet, a number of external variables influenced acceptance. Findings and recommendations from this review can provide guidance for developing and evaluating patient-centered home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs to stakeholders and clinicians. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/34657", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2022/1/e34657", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/34657", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34994711" }