@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/39851，作者=“Boucher, Eliane和Honomichl, Ryan和Ward, Haley和Powell, Tyler和Stoeckl, Sarah Elizabeth和Parks, Acacia”，标题=“数字福祉干预对老年人的影响:真实世界用户数据的回顾性分析”，期刊=“JMIR老龄化”，年=“2022”，月=“Sep”，日=“2”，卷=“5”，数字=“3”，页面=“e39851”，关键词=“移动应用程序;心理健康;老年人;技术应用;数字健康;背景:数字干预已被证明对各种精神健康障碍和问题有效。然而，很少有研究考察数字干预对老年人的影响;因此，对于老年人如何参与或受益于这些干预措施，我们知之甚少。鉴于65岁以上人群对技术的采用率远远低于一般人群，而且大约20%的老年人受到精神健康障碍的影响，有必要研究老年人是否会使用数字干预措施并从中受益。目的:本研究旨在研究老年人参与数字幸福干预(Happify)的程度，以及参与该计划是否能改善主观幸福感和焦虑症状。 Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we analyzed data from 375 real-world Happify users aged ≥65 years who signed up for the platform between January 1, 2019, and December 23, 2021. Changes in well-being and anxiety symptoms across 42 to 182 days were assessed using responses to the in-app assessment, which users were prompted to take every 2 weeks, and were compared among users who engaged with the program at the recommended level (ie, 2 or more activities per week) or below the recommended level. Results: In all, 30{\%} (113/375) of the sample engaged with the platform at the recommended level (ie, completed an average of 2 or more activities per week), and overall, users completed an average of 43.35 (SD 87.80) activities, ranging from 1 to 786, between their first and last assessment. Users were also active on the platform for an average of 19.36 (SD 27.16) days, ranging from 1 to 152 days. Moreover, older adults who engaged at the recommended level experienced significantly greater improvements in subjective well-being (P=.002) and anxiety symptoms (P<.001) relative to those who completed fewer activities. Conclusions: These data provide preliminary evidence that older adults engage with and benefit from digital well-being interventions. We believe that these findings highlight the importance of considering older adult populations in digital health research. More research is needed to understand potential barriers to using digital interventions among older adults and whether digital interventions should be modified to account for this population's particular needs (eg, ensuring that the intervention is accessible using a variety of devices). However, these results are an important step in demonstrating the feasibility of such interventions in a population that is assumed to be less inclined toward digital approaches. ", issn="2561-7605", doi="10.2196/39851", url="https://aging.www.mybigtv.com/2022/3/e39851", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/39851", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36053569" }