医药网站和“仅限专业人士”信息:卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析患者信任和自主性的影响%A Graber,Mark Alan %A Hershkop,Eliyakim %A Graber,Rachel Ilana %+爱荷华大学卡弗医学院急诊和家庭医学系，霍金斯大道200号，1008 RCP爱荷华州爱荷华市，爱荷华州，爱荷华州，爱荷华市，美国，1 319 321 6572,mark-graber@uiowa.edu %K信任%K伦理%K个人自主性%K可读性%D 2017 %7 24.05.2017 %9原文%J J Med Internet Res %G英文%X背景:获取信息对病人有效行使自主权至关重要。一个日益重要的医疗信息来源是互联网。个人经常转向制药公司(“pharma”)网站寻找药物信息。目的:本研究的目的是确定制药网站上是否有被禁止的信息:是否有对患者隐藏的信息，除非她证明自己是卫生保健提供者?我们讨论了我们的发现对卫生保健伦理的影响。方法:我们审查了40个“仅限专业人员”区域的便利样本，并确定访问这些区域是否受到限制，要求用户证明是美国的卫生保健专业人员。结果:在被审查的40个网站中，有38个网站的信息被标记为仅供卫生保健专业人员使用。其中，24个要求用户在能够访问这些“隐藏”信息之前证明其医疗保健提供者的身份。 Conclusions: Many pharma websites include information in a “professionals-only” section. Of these, the majority require attestation that the user is a health care professional before they can access the information. This leaves patients with two bad choices: (1) not accessing the information or (2) lying about being a health care professional. Both of these outcomes are unacceptable. In the first instance, the patient’s access to information is limited, potentially impairing their health and their ability to make reasonable and well-informed decisions. In the second instance, they may be induced to lie in a medical setting. “Teaching” patients to lie may have adverse consequences for the provider-patient relationship. %M 28539303 %R 10.2196/jmir.7164 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2017/5/e178/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7164 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28539303