@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / / jmir。1194，作者=“Christensen, Helen and Griffiths, Kathleen M and Farrer, Louise”，标题=“焦虑和抑郁的网络干预依从性:系统回顾”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2009”，月=“四月”，日=“24”，卷=“11”，数=“2”，页=“e13”，关键词=“患者辍学;抑郁症;抑郁症,主要;焦虑障碍;互联网;心理健康服务;背景:为焦虑和抑郁提供认知和行为干预的开放访问网站的特点是依从性差。我们需要更多地了解坚持，以便最大限度地发挥基于互联网的干预措施对与常见精神障碍相关的疾病负担的影响。目的:本文的目的是简要回顾关于网络干预依从性的文献，并调查焦虑和抑郁网络研究的随机对照试验的退出率和依从性。 Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials using Internet interventions for anxiety and depression was conducted, and data was collected on dropout and adherence, predictors of adherence, and reasons for dropout. Results: Relative to reported rates of dropout from open access sites, the present study found that the rates of attrition in randomized controlled trials were lower, ranging from approximately 1 - 50{\%}. Predictors of adherence included disease severity, treatment length, and chronicity. Very few studies formally examined reasons for dropout, and most studies failed to use appropriate statistical techniques to analyze missing data. Conclusions: Dropout rates from randomized controlled trials of Web interventions are low relative to dropout from open access websites. The development of theoretical models of adherence is as important in the area of Internet intervention research as it is in the behavioral health literature. Disease-based factors in anxiety and depression need further investigation. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/jmir.1194", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2009/2/e13/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1194", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19403466" }