@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/39189，作者=“Tong, Catherine和Kernoghan, Alison和Lemmon, Kassandra和Fernandes, Paige和Elliott, Jacobi和Sacco, Veronica和Bodemer, Sheila和Stolee, Paul”，标题=“从一个扩展的共同设计过程中开发一个老年人移动健康应用程序的教训和思考:多阶段，混合方法研究”，期刊=“JMIR老化”，年=“2022”，月=“10月”，日=“28”，卷=“5”，数字=“4”，页=“e39189”，关键词=“移动健康;移动健康;老年人;卫生保健提供者;合作设计;用户体验或UX设计;定性的;应用程序;老年人;卫生保健; care provider", abstract="Background: There are many mobile health (mHealth) apps for older adult patients, but research has found that broadly speaking, mHealth still fails to meet the specific needs of older adult users. Others have highlighted the need to embed users in the mHealth design process in a fulsome and meaningful way. Co-design has been widely used in the development of mHealth apps and involves stakeholders in each phase of the design and development process. The involvement of older adults in the co-design processes is variable. To date, co-design approaches have tended toward embedding the stakeholders in early phases (eg, predesign and generative) but not throughout. Objective: The aim of this study was to reflect on the processes and lessons learned from engaging in an extended co-design process to develop an mHealth app for older adults, with older users contributing at each phase. This study aimed to design an mHealth tool to assist older adults in coordinating their care with health care professionals and caregivers. Methods: Our work to conceptualize, develop, and test the mHealth app consisted of 4 phases: phase 1, consulting stakeholders; phase 2, app development and co-designing with older adults; phase 3, field-testing with a smaller sample of older adult volunteer testers; and phase 4, reflecting, internally, on lessons learned from this process. In each phase, we drew on qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews and focus groups, all of which were analyzed in NVivo 11, using team-based thematic analysis. Results: In phase 1, we identified key features that older adults and primary care providers wanted in an app, and each user group identified different priority features (older adults principally sought support to use the mHealth app, whereas primary care providers prioritized recoding illnesses, immunizations, and appointments). Phases 2 and 3 revealed significant mismatches between what the older adult users wanted and what our developers were able and willing to deliver. We were unable to craft the app that our consultations recommended, which the older adult field testers asked for. In phase 4, we reflected on our abilities to embed the voices and perspectives of older adults throughout the project when working with a developer not familiar with or committed to the core principles of co-design. We draw on this challenging experience to highlight several recommendations for those embarking on a co-design process that includes developers and IT vendors, researchers, and older adult users. Conclusions: Although our final mHealth app did not reflect all the needs and wishes of our older adult testers, our consultation process identified key features and contextual information essential for those developing apps to support older adults in managing their health and health care. ", issn="2561-7605", doi="10.2196/39189", url="https://aging.www.mybigtv.com/2022/4/e39189", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/39189", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36306166" }